aussieguy55 wrote:Gnuse and Elliott are Christians. Why not look at their arguments?
No they aren’t.
I don’t think I need read every word of pilpul and let a Pharisee reinterpret the Bible for me. Their arguments are r____ and gay.
What do you think about this translation of Matthew 23? Is it accurate:
Nor are you to be called `teacher,' for you have one Teacher, the Christ...
"Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the kingdom of heaven in men's faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to.
"Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when he becomes one, you make him twice as much a son of hell as you are.
"Woe to you, blind guides! You say, `If anyone swears by the temple, it means nothing; but if anyone swears by the gold of the temple, he is bound by his oath.'
Don't you think Luther's translation is interesting? ! Cor 6:9 which in the NRSV is "sodomites" Luther translates as knaben schaben "boy molesters" In other words pedophiles. Read the papers if you dare. You might be wrong in your view.
This is correct. Homosexual men are invariably pedophiles. Homosexual men reproduce by “molesting boys”. Luther seems to have discovered that the scriptures use the term interchangeably, which I think fits my view just fine.
Popular piety has maintained for years that the Sodom narrative...”
Look at that sentence. You want me to believe that a Christian wrote that? Holy smokes if that isn’t some ...