Bishop Smokey’s Leap Day Message to *Good* People

[Smokey]

Notice: This message is for brothers and sisters of good character and stock only.

Good morning!

Last year, I attempted to make a few posts discussing the “chosen people” in the Bible and what that title means, but within a matter of hours and before I could finish, I was censored and censured by [real name deleted] “Dr. Shades” who told me, without even acknowledging the irony, that all further posts about the so-called “chosen people” would be met with the same response. This is on a website designed to be critical of Mormons and Christians but which purports to be a harbinger of free speech and a refuge of uncensored ideas.

In addition to censorship of discussions of the book of Genesis, the moderators sanctioned threats to “dox” and harass, and it just so happens that the next day I left the country with my smart, beautiful, loving, fair-faced wife and our children for the Christmas holidays.

When I returned to the States several weeks ago, I found out that my wife will be giving me our fourth child this summer. This is all to say that I have been busy with real life things, and still am, but am not discouraged. There are good men reading this right now, and I felt compelled to take the time here to reassure my brothers, who might even be reading this message from an uncomfortable place in life, that they are in fact God’s chosen people.

The first thing I want you to remember is that Satan is called the Father of Lies in the Bible. This is a deliberate title. Satan is responsible for Drag Queen story hour, murder, homosexual perversion/pedophilia, drugs and more, but his designation is and always will be the Father of Lies.

His people are called descendants of the Father of Lies by Jesus the Son of God. What they say about themselves, not to mention what they try to teach you about the most important Book of all time, or your birthright, or your children’s birthright, is invariably going to be a Lie. They can’t help themselves. It is in their putrid DNA.

The Bible teaches us about these people, which explains the censorship of those discussions. The Book of Mormon also teaches us about these people, sometimes to a more specific degree, which is why these “dark, filthy, and loathsome people” have set about destroying that message too.

To conclude this Opening Post and embark on this soon-to-be epic thread, let’s take a look at the man responsible for editing out the phrases “white and delightsome” and “dark, filthy, and loathsome people” from the Book of Mormon.



What phrase do you think applies to him more?

Food for thought.

In future posts, I will explain to my brothers and sisters how God has given us this gift of discernment called physiognomy, and how it can be used particularly when dealing with anti-Christian/Mormons.

Hope you are living well, my Brothers and Sisters, and I’m happy to be back here with you.

[Smokey]

And within 4 minutes pornography addict “Dr. Shades” censors and removes my post without notice or cited violation of any rules.

[Violation of Universal Rule #3 deleted]

[Shulem]

Smokey, for now on this is how I'm going to imagine you:

Smokey having sex with Satan.

You a dirty bad boy, Smokey. Your mama spank your ass.

Smoooookey, Smooooookey, Mama want to spank your ass! Come here boy, mama spank your ass.

[Lemmie]

Smokey, for now on this is how I'm going to imagine you:

Smokey having sex with Satan.

You a dirty bad boy, Smokey. Your mama spank your ass.

Smoooookey, Smooooookey, Mama want to spank your ass! Come here boy, mama spank your ass.

ah Shulem i love you!!!

You ALWAYS know how to handle these trolls. I think MG hasn't recovered yet from your last run at him.

(Or maybe he just liked it a LEETLE too much. )

[Shulem]

ah Shulem i love you!!!

You ALWAYS know how to handle these trolls. I think MG hasn't recovered yet from your last run at him.

(Or maybe he just liked it a LEETLE too much. )

Smokey and MG sitting in a tree, K-i-s-s-i-n-g!

They be nasty boys.



Give me a kiss, Smokey baby! Make it yummy.

[cwald]

Oh goodie. Smokey is back.

[Smokey]

What a surprise that Paul Osbourne (((hmm, what kind of last name is that, by the way?))) a [deleted] is free to post X-rated material on Dr. Cuck’s secular Jewish anti-Mormonism and Asian Fetish website, but if someone posts about the Bible and God’s words they are censored and suspended.

[schreech]

[Doctor Steuss]

You guys ever sit and wonder what it would be like if you were to anthropomorphize a used long-haul trucker’s seat cushion listed on Craigslist?

I used to.

[Smokey]

Despite Dr. Shades censoring pro LDS posts, including my discussions of the Bible, let’s try to continue and finish our discussion of physiognomy. We may have to use some coded language to make it past his Soviet-style censorship.

The Bible states clearly that when using the gift of discernment we can see things using physiognomy.

The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Isaiah 3:9

Obviously, the Church has taught us about this gift of discernment much to the chagrin of the dark and loathsome. It was not a good person, not one with a white and delightsome countenance, who changed the wording of the Book of Mormon to remove the obvious reference to physiognomy.

No, it was this man:



If you were to guess his heritage, would you think this person has a good Christian lineage?

Let’s take a look at some of the people who would interpret the Book of Mormon for you and lie to you, as is their nature.



Even though this picture cost thousands of dollars to capture and photoshop, it can’t help being repulsive. The wig, the professional make up artist’s tireless work, the hundreds of proofs that were rejected before this one was chosen as the very best image. Look at the face. There is something wrong. The shew of its countenance doth witness against them.

Let’s take a look at another prominent “ex-Mormon” who would interpret God’s Word for you.

[Lemmie]

You guys ever sit and wonder what it would be like if you were to anthropomorphize a used long-haul trucker’s seat cushion listed on Craigslist?

I used to.

And does it have a name?

[Shulem]

What a surprise that Paul Osbourne (((hmm, what kind of last name is that, by the way?))) a [deleted] is free to post X-rated material on Dr. Cuck’s secular Jewish anti-Mormonism and Asian Fetish website, but if someone posts about the Bible and God’s words they are censored and suspended.

Oh, gawd, you again? ____ me.

How many ____ times do I have to tell you that there is no U in my last name?

Jesus ____ Christ! You're so ____ stupid.

Bite me, you worthless piece of ____!

[Smokey]

Paul, I’m sure you won’t do it, but it would be very informative if you were to post a picture of your face, and disprove the Bible and Book of Mormon with your delightful countenance and totally-not-mangled, not-hideous face.

If you really wanted to be helpful, you could also give us a brief summary of how wonderful your daily life is, and if you’re living out your last days in squalor and loneliness and alcoholism in a sweaty studio apartment.

Maybe you could even give the newbs a quick rundown on your divorce and how you once claimed to leave the Church because you didn’t like praying a certain non-pagan way.

[Shulem]

Sniff this, Smokey, you ____ son of a ____!

[Smokey]

I guess Paul is shy.

Oh well. I’m sure he looks exactly the way he is supposed to look.

The light of the body is the eye: therefore when thine eye is single, thy whole body also is full of light; but when thine eye is evil, thy body also is full of darkness. Luke 11: 34

Let’s examine another “ex-Mormon” character:



Apart from the Bible and Book of Mormon, one of the best and definitive sources for scientific information on physiognomy is a collection of works titled “Essays on Physiognomy” published in 1878.

Here is a passage on the eyes:

“We only need consider the astonishing difference between the eyes of men and brutes to determine, from the mere outline of the eyes, the difference of character. I am certain that, would any person undertake the labour of delineating the gradation, from the eye of a fish, or crab, to the eye of man, an animal system of physiognomy might be obtained, by such outlines. How much may be deduced from the long, the circular, or the oblique eye, especially from the position and sinking of the corners! The eye of the dog may be considered as a mean between that of man and the wildest animals. Fish and birds have round eyes, without angles at the corners of the eyelids. The sharper the angle, and the more it sinks, the more it is crafty. The more horizontal the eye and its angle are, the more is it human. The less arched the upper outline is, without being horizontal, the more is it phlegmatic and stupid.”

[Lemmie]

<typical boring stuff snipped>

Oh, gawd, you again? ____ me.

How many ____ times do I have to tell you that there is no U in my last name?

Jesus ____ Christ! You're so ____ stupid.

Bite me, you worthless piece of ____!

Troll B trolls, but what is this world coming to when you can’t even count on the trolls to spell correctly the names of their trollees?!!

That’s just bad work ethic. We’ve had much harder working trolls, this recent iteration is such a disappointment.

[Smokey]

According to our textbook, this ex-Mormon has eyes that are “insipid, vacant, unnatural.” Notice the similarity in the textbook drawing from 300 years ago.

[Lemmie]

You guys ever sit and wonder what it would be like if you were to anthropomorphize a used long-haul trucker’s seat cushion listed on Craigslist?

I used to.

And does it have a name?

I have to say, I am still quite curious about Dr. Steuss’ anthropomorphism here. Hopefully he logs in soon and puts my curiosity out of its misery.

[Smokey]

Let’s pause for a minute, refresh our pallets, and remind ourselves of what a healthy normal human looks like. Note the physiognomy, the countenance, the obvious happiness.

[Lemmie]

Well Shulem, you were right. This is a low effort troll. Cut and paste only.

[Smokey]

Now contrast those images of Godly people with these “ex-Mormons” while noting the diagram from our textbook.












When you do this it is easy to see that physiognomy is very real.