Blake Ostler Erupts with Rage on FPR

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
User avatar
lostindc
God
Posts: 2380
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 5:27 pm

Re: Blake Ostler Erupts with Rage on FPR

Post by lostindc »

Everybody Wang Chung wrote:
lostindc wrote: When I was still in the Church I couldn’t believe the love his writings received. I heard individuals call Blake the Mormon Plato.

Based on Blake's online history of swearing, degrading individuals and crude language, I think a more appropriate comparison would be that Blake Ostler is the Andrew Dice Clay of Mormonism.

Also, I would like to add that Blake's fake hairpiece looks horrendous.

Image



Agreed

I would also add that Blake doesn’t believe in the truth claims of the Mormon church and he plays word games to ensure his beliefs have a place at the Mormon table. I am willing to even state that Blake is a fraud.
2019 = #100,000missionariesstrong

User avatar
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 6585
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:04 am

Re: Blake Ostler Erupts with Rage on FPR

Post by Philo Sofee »

Dr Moore wrote:I read Ostler’s interview of McMurrin today (1981). He presented as a balanced and thoughtful individual at the time - and with an admitted heretic no less - as a student, if I am reading the preface correctly.

So, what happened?

When and why did Ostler don the mask of the raving lunatic thug who blasts anonymous heretics as cowards? What traumatic event catalyzed his metamorphosis from nuanced student caterpillar into the Menacing Moth of Mormon Madness?


I would take a stab at saying a few things happened as I perceive it. One, the internet. No, sincerely! Now everyone has a voice and control is truly gone for any organization to control information.
Two, Ostler's life work his magnum opus on the Mormon Theology of God is, for the most part, simply ignored. For one thing it didn't get very much printing at all, and I was astoundingly fortunate to get the entire set! And, the public just simply aren't interested in seeing yet another Christian sect get some points up on a different Christian sect, in this case, Mormonism up some points on traditional Christianity. The world yawned at the years of laborious and loving labor Ostler went through and it appears to be very ungrateful and unimpressed. THAT can be a canker on an ego soul, without question. After all, he was banking on making quite a few conversions with it, and so far as I can gather, no one has joined Mormonism based on Ostler's life long and loving work. And none of us are going back either based on his magnum opus. This is a no win for Ostler, a no relevance that tanked years and years of his life.

He missed a fantastic opportunity when the window actually opened for him of taking on the 4 Horsemen of atheism when the New Atheism was born, he could have tackled them, but instead went for the blase and truly beyond knowledge of 99% of humanity against Christian philosophers of which literally no one reads, and literally no one gives a flying flip about.

Now that the New Atheism made its case, there is no point in contending with them, they have moved on as has everyone else. But what it did is bring in a fresh and brighter crop, much more nuanced and intellectually able atheists of whom the Mormon apologists refuse to touch with a ten foot pole (to steal a Nibleyism from the old man himself).

I have in mind Michael Martin. I have in mind Kai Nielsen, and James A. Lindsay, Marshall Brain, Richard M. Gale, Nicholas Everitt, Matthew S. McCormick, David Eller, Scott F Aikin & Robert B. Talisse, A. C. Grayling, and those sophisticated philosophical atheists, not the loud mouth blabber mouthed publicity seeking ones that Mormons every now and then pretend to take on, but merely comment on a mere weakest argument they present, and continue to cherry pick even the weakest atheists! I have yet to see a Mormon actually take on the strongest arguments of Dawkins, Hitchins, or Stenger yet. Harris I am not that familiar with, unfortunately. And you certainly won't see them even dare get into the cage with the above named litany of philosophical atheists I have listed, not with an integrity and actual wholesale refuting in a thorough manner as they did against Evangelicalism in the old FARMS days. But Evangelicalism was a weak kneed little 5 year old boy compared to the atheists, so it was blase and a cake walk to smash them to smithereens. Not so the atheists.

In short, deep down, Mormon scholars and apologists recognize that they have lost the war, but are afraid to admit it. I know that fear. I know that fear. They are unaware that there really is a spectacular bright and loving and enduring light at the end of the tunnel, but they can't, nay, they won't look to it. It is sincerely no fun being on the losing side, and realizing that one is forced to defend it (the sunk cost fallacy), and hence their joyless existence and apologetic. It's drab, it means precious little, there is no enthusiasm, because there is no way out (in their minds). When one loses hope, anger prevails, one lashes out irrationally and emotionally, and with a great deal of vehemence, and that is where we see they are at. Thank goodness the anger phase can fade out as they move forward into the greater light, if they allow themselves that option.
Dr CamNC4Me
"Dr. Peterson and his Callithumpian cabal of BYU idiots have been marginalized by their own inevitable irrelevancy defending a fraud."

User avatar
Shulem
Son of Perdition
Posts: 11922
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:48 pm

Re: Blake Ostler Erupts with Rage on FPR

Post by Shulem »

Philo Sofee wrote:In short, deep down, Mormon scholars and apologists recognize that they have lost the war, but are afraid to admit it. I know that fear. I know that fear. They are unaware that there really is a spectacular bright and loving and enduring light at the end of the tunnel, but they can't, nay, they won't look to it. It is sincerely no fun being on the losing side, and realizing that one is forced to defend it (the sunk cost fallacy), and hence their joyless existence and apologetic. It's drab, it means precious little, there is no enthusiasm, because there is no way out (in their minds). When one loses hope, anger prevails, one lashes out irrationally and emotionally, and with a great deal of vehemence, and that is where we see they are at. Thank goodness the anger phase can fade out as they move forward into the greater light, if they allow themselves that option.

That was inspired.

Well said.

User avatar
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 6585
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:04 am

Re: Blake Ostler Erupts with Rage on FPR

Post by Philo Sofee »

Shulem wrote:
Philo Sofee wrote:In short, deep down, Mormon scholars and apologists recognize that they have lost the war, but are afraid to admit it. I know that fear. I know that fear. They are unaware that there really is a spectacular bright and loving and enduring light at the end of the tunnel, but they can't, nay, they won't look to it. It is sincerely no fun being on the losing side, and realizing that one is forced to defend it (the sunk cost fallacy), and hence their joyless existence and apologetic. It's drab, it means precious little, there is no enthusiasm, because there is no way out (in their minds). When one loses hope, anger prevails, one lashes out irrationally and emotionally, and with a great deal of vehemence, and that is where we see they are at. Thank goodness the anger phase can fade out as they move forward into the greater light, if they allow themselves that option.

That was inspired.

Well said.

Thank you, that is very kind to say....
Dr CamNC4Me
"Dr. Peterson and his Callithumpian cabal of BYU idiots have been marginalized by their own inevitable irrelevancy defending a fraud."

User avatar
Dr Moore
Endowed Chair of Historical Innovation
Posts: 836
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2019 11:19 pm

Re: Blake Ostler Erupts with Rage on FPR

Post by Dr Moore »

Philo Sofee wrote:Two, Ostler's life work his magnum opus on the Mormon Theology of God is, for the most part, simply ignored.


What a fascinating observation.

Ironically, my kids are watching The Incredibles tonight. Ostler is Sindrome, the ignored genius who turns into a bitter thug.

If it’s true that the opposite of Love is not Hate, but Apathy, then we have a rationale to feel sorry for Ostler. It’s still no excuse for his behavior.

User avatar
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 6585
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:04 am

Re: Blake Ostler Erupts with Rage on FPR

Post by Philo Sofee »

Dr Moore wrote:
Philo Sofee wrote:Two, Ostler's life work his magnum opus on the Mormon Theology of God is, for the most part, simply ignored.


What a fascinating observation.

Ironically, my kids are watching The Incredibles tonight. Ostler is Sindrome, the ignored genius who turns into a bitter thug.

If it’s true that the opposite of Love is not Hate, but Apathy, then we have a rationale to feel sorry for Ostler. It’s no excuse for his behavior.


Agreed. The apologists can't even stick around anymore to have soup and crackers with Vogel to see if something can work out with the GAEL and papyri but instead sulk off and complain bitterly about the church ignoring their own scholars. But its the CHURCH who is doing this, no wonder they are so nasty and intemperately condescending little brats intellectually these days. Pouting because Big Brother wants to ditch em, and they feel left out, so they lash out.

However, they have attempted for decades now to demonstrate beyond any reasonable doubt that they do in fact, have brains. Then why not use them to converse with others who see things differently than they do? Because they have no empathy. Was that empathy for apostate Christians of the Evangelical flavor we saw them mock, spit upon, refute, dissuade, make merry of and slam?! No. The over arching rule was seek out and destroy. Hence, they are peevish bullies to all others, which is what we are seeing these days. No one can take them seriously. They refuse to be serious about the truth. They refuse to even try to. I can almost see myself feeling sorry for them... almost.
Dr CamNC4Me
"Dr. Peterson and his Callithumpian cabal of BYU idiots have been marginalized by their own inevitable irrelevancy defending a fraud."

User avatar
Dan Vogel
Prophet
Posts: 876
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:26 pm

Re: Blake Ostler Erupts with Rage on FPR

Post by Dan Vogel »

Dr Moore wrote:I read Ostler’s interview of McMurrin today (1981). He presented as a balanced and thoughtful individual at the time - and with an admitted heretic no less - as a student, if I am reading the preface correctly.

So, what happened?

When and why did Ostler don the mask of the raving lunatic thug who blasts anonymous heretics as cowards? What traumatic event catalyzed his metamorphosis from nuanced student caterpillar into the Menacing Moth of Mormon Madness?


This reminds me of the time when I was attending the Sunstone Symposium in the Hotel Utah in 1986 and met McMurrin for the first time. I had just published Indian Origins in 1986 as a senior in the University. I walked up to the Signature Books table where George Smith and McMurrin were talking about my book and McMurrin was praising it. George said the author is right behind you and McMurrin turned around, shook my hand, looked me in the eye, and said: “Young man, you are going to have a brilliant career.” Wow! I was just beginning my scholarly journey and that meant a great deal to me. I had read his books and articles and so I highly valued his opinion.
I do not want you to think that I am very righteous, for I am not.
Joseph Smith (History of the Church 5:401)

User avatar
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 6585
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:04 am

Re: Blake Ostler Erupts with Rage on FPR

Post by Philo Sofee »

It appears to me he was more prophetic than the vast majority of church leaders have been since he uttered those words to you......
Dr CamNC4Me
"Dr. Peterson and his Callithumpian cabal of BYU idiots have been marginalized by their own inevitable irrelevancy defending a fraud."

User avatar
Doctor Scratch
B.H. Roberts Chair of Mopologetic Studies
Posts: 8005
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:44 am

Re: Blake Ostler Erupts with Rage on FPR

Post by Doctor Scratch »

It seems that Blake Ostler has fully recovered from his butt-hurt and is now posting again on "Faith Promoting Rumor." Good for him. So far there haven't been any temper tantrums or anything of that nature, but it's still early. We'll see how long this lasts.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14

User avatar
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 6585
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:04 am

Re: Blake Ostler Erupts with Rage on FPR

Post by Philo Sofee »

Doctor Scratch wrote:
Sun Aug 02, 2020 8:48 pm
It seems that Blake Ostler has fully recovered from his butt-hurt and is now posting again on "Faith Promoting Rumor." Good for him. So far there haven't been any temper tantrums or anything of that nature, but it's still early. We'll see how long this lasts.
He's hopefully bound to be more interesting to talk about than coach and Midget.....
Dr CamNC4Me
"Dr. Peterson and his Callithumpian cabal of BYU idiots have been marginalized by their own inevitable irrelevancy defending a fraud."

User avatar
moksha
God
Posts: 22387
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Blake Ostler Erupts with Rage on FPR

Post by moksha »

Blake Ostler wrote: And Dr. Scratch — really? You do know that Dr. Midgely has passed, right? Truly you are disgusting.
I fully buy Mr. Ostler's explanation that by passed, he meant gaseous emanations coming from Professor Midgley.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace

User avatar
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 6585
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:04 am

Re: Blake Ostler Erupts with Rage on FPR

Post by Philo Sofee »

I honestly dunno which hole he passes more gas through, perhaps a meter attached on both ends of him for a month for accurate measuring would be appropriate.......
Dr CamNC4Me
"Dr. Peterson and his Callithumpian cabal of BYU idiots have been marginalized by their own inevitable irrelevancy defending a fraud."

Post Reply