What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
Paul Osborne

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by Paul Osborne »

x2


Bite my wire. Do you think I want to grow up for you? Why? So YOU will approve of me and consider me a normal person? No thanks.

Paul O

User avatar
Dr. Shades
Founder & Visionary
Posts: 14064
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:07 pm

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by Dr. Shades »

Rambo:

I have received permission from Lord Anubis to reveal the fact that he is absolutely **NOT** a sock puppet of Paul Osborne.

User avatar
Rambo
God
Posts: 1933
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:43 am

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by Rambo »

Dr. Shades wrote:Rambo:

I have received permission from Lord Anubis to reveal the fact that he is absolutely **NOT** a sock puppet of Paul Osborne.


How do you know this shades? I would think most people on the board would agree with me. Paul always seems to post after Lord Anubis. Oh well I was just having some fun :)

User avatar
Dr. Shades
Founder & Visionary
Posts: 14064
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:07 pm

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by Dr. Shades »

Rambo wrote:How do you know this shades?

Because I was contacted by the REAL puppet-master and was asked to pass the information along to you via this thread. The one who contacted me was NOT Paul Osborne.

Gadianton Plumber

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by Gadianton Plumber »

I know who Lord Anubis is. I was watching the sign ins and outs very closely. If he pleases, he can PM me so I won't reveal it.

User avatar
beastie
God
Posts: 14216
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 8:26 pm

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by beastie »

Not to divert attention from who smells like pee and all that, because I know how riveting that is, but did Shades make a final decision on this?
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com

User avatar
Trevor
God
Posts: 7213
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 12:28 pm

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by Trevor »

Bump. I, too, am interested in what Shades' final decision is.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”

User avatar
beastie
God
Posts: 14216
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 8:26 pm

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by beastie »

Maybe it's kind of liking praying for an answer.... you gotta listen real hard...

anyone have a stupor of thought?
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com

Ray A

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by Ray A »

Shades is usually very quick to come up with solutions. On this occasion it appears not.

User avatar
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 20392
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:02 am

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

Hello,

Or perhaps he is a good manager, and does not feel the need to react to every_single_hyperventilation by the users? This too shall pass, friends (except Ms. Jersey Girl).

Very Respectfully,

Doctor CamNC4Me
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

User avatar
Dr. Shades
Founder & Visionary
Posts: 14064
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:07 pm

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by Dr. Shades »

Ray A wrote:Shades is usually very quick to come up with solutions. On this occasion it appears not.

That's because I was trying to be democratic. Y'all hadn't finished batting ideas around yet.

I think my original thought was the best one, with two caveats:

  • Things that happen (or don't happen) on other message boards will have no bearing whatsoever on what happens on this one. Who can monitor the entire Internet (other than the MA&D moderators)? Regardless of where else a person posts his/her name and/or picture(s), this board is to be considered hermetically sealed from the outside if the target of the information wishes it to be so. Failure to post X about oneself on this board will be indicative of the target not wishing that X be posted on this board.
  • No retroactive or ex post facto punishments. Everyone has a clean slate as of this post being, uh, posted.

That said, I'll have to figure out the most aesthetically pleasing way to integrate the following with the other rules. As a reminder, the new policy is this, copied-and-pasted from my earlier post in this thread:

Posting personal information is the same as posting behind-the-scenes information: In both cases, the target intends for the information to remain confidential. Ergo, the penalties for both will be the same.

(I envision MormonDiscussions to be multi-dimensional: One plane consisting of the board itself, and an alternate plane consisting of the chat and PM features. If posters have a guarantee that material from the shadow realm will never be posted to the sun realm, then A) the free exchange of ideas and information will be just as vibrant in the shadow realm as it is here in the sun realm, and B) the sun realm will no longer be bogged down with hostile discussions of the goings-on in the shadow realm. Win-win.)

The first time personal or behind-the-scenes information is posted without permission, the poster will be given a one-week suspension. This way, the thread can wind down on its own (because closing the thread would otherwise punish everyone, not just the miscreant). If the punishee fails to learn his/her lesson and targets the same individual again or otherwise demonstrates that he/she has not learned his/her lesson, then a longer ban. . . X months. . . will be implemented, as appropriate.

A blatant threat to post such information or a vivid description of such information, such that readers can get the "gist" of what the information contains, may be considered the same as an actual posting of the same, depending on the blatant-ness of it, as I subjectively determine in my heart of hearts. At the very least, a threat will receive a friendly reminder of the consequence of following through with said threat.

In any case, from this point forward, no one need fear that personal or behind-the-scenes information will ever remain posted to the board (against his/her will). A PM to me or another moderator will result in its swift deletion in any case, regardless of what else we decide.


Personal information: Information about a poster that he/she has not revealed on this message board, regardless of whether he/she has revealed the same information elsewhere.
Behind-the-scenes information: Information received, exchanged, or learned via the chat or private message features.


I hope this puts everyone's fears to rest and allows us all to freely operate in both the sun realm and the shadow realm once again.

User avatar
beastie
God
Posts: 14216
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 8:26 pm

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by beastie »

Thanks, Shade.

Would what happened to Eric be covered under this rule?
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com

User avatar
Trevor
God
Posts: 7213
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 12:28 pm

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by Trevor »

As I interpret this rule, sock-puppets cannot be revealed. In my opinion this constitutes behind-the-scenes information. Am I interpreting this too broadly, or is this correct?
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”

Yoda

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by Yoda »

Trevor wrote:As I interpret this rule, sock-puppets cannot be revealed. In my opinion this constitutes behind-the-scenes information. Am I interpreting this too broadly, or is this correct?

You are correct.

Also, only Moderators have the ability to see IP matchings, and definitively know who is using what sock puppet. As Moderators, we are under solid obligation to keep sock puppets confidential.

marg

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by marg »

liz3564 wrote:
Trevor wrote:As I interpret this rule, sock-puppets cannot be revealed. In my opinion this constitutes behind-the-scenes information. Am I interpreting this too broadly, or is this correct?

You are correct.

Also, only Moderators have the ability to see IP matchings, and definitively know who is using what sock puppet. As Moderators, we are under solid obligation to keep sock puppets confidential.


I was under the impression that Shades had left the decision making to the board on this whole business or IRL info and behind the scenes info, that it was to be a democratic process, rather than his or any moderator's decision making. And yet it appears you and/or Shades have made a decision 're "sock-puppets" are not to be revealed'. I don't have any problems with whatever decision is to be decided, but it doesn't appear to be have been done democratically. Most of the time sock-puppets are light hearted fun, but it is possible that sometimes it would not be and I see little reason that under all circumstances they should be protected.

If Trevor & maybe a buddy or 2 of his (as a for instance) decide to set up a sock-puppet in order to harass Scratch and Scratch finds out via pm what is going on, why on earth can't he blow the whistle on malicious game playing? Why would he be punished when he's simply protecting himself and letting the board know the sort of game playing going on if that is what was happening?

If I was a Mormon, I wouldn't want to participate on a board which is heavily stacked with critics which protects critics in their possibly game playing against me. Someone like DCP (as a for instance) should never if he's got any sense post here under such circumstances.

User avatar
MCB
God
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:14 am

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by MCB »

If I was a Mormon, I wouldn't want to participate on a board which is heavily stacked with critics which protects critics in their possibly game playing against me. Someone like DCP (as a for instance) should never if he's got any sense post here under such circumstances.
Given the support that the -10's give me, I won't even question who and where they are. Or who enjoys the protections of MPD.
Huckelberry said:
I see the order and harmony to be the very image of God which smiles upon us each morning as we awake.

http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/a ... cc_toc.htm

Yoda

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by Yoda »

Marg---

Good grief...Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill.

All I was trying to say was that although Mods know for a fact who sock puppets belong to, we feel an obligation to the board to keep this knowledge to ourselves.

Leave it to you to turn something that I think should be seen as a positive courtesy into some type of negative conspiracy.

(I would insert a roll eyes emoticon here if I wasn't posting from my phone).

User avatar
Dr. Shades
Founder & Visionary
Posts: 14064
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:07 pm

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by Dr. Shades »

beastie wrote:Would what happened to Eric be covered under this rule?

I don't exactly know what you mean by "covered," but I think you're referring to punishment for what DCP and rcrocket did to Eric. The answer is no, neither one would receive punishment, since this board is considered to be hermetically sealed from the outside world when it comes to IRL information, in both directions. In other words, if anyone revealed Eric's true identity here, then yes, that person would be punished. But meddling with it elsewhere would garner no punishment, since, again, when it comes to this rule, this board is to be considered hermetically sealed from the outside world.

Besides, let's think about it: Wouldn't we want both of them to be around in order to account for their actions? To be available to field questions from the rest of us?

Trevor wrote:As I interpret this rule, sock-puppets cannot be revealed. In my opinion this constitutes behind-the-scenes information. Am I interpreting this too broadly, or is this correct?

You're interpreting it too broadly. Sock-puppets cannot be revealed by those "in-the-know." They can most assuredly be guessed at and discussed by everyone else otherwise lacking behind-the-scenes information.

User avatar
Trevor
God
Posts: 7213
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 12:28 pm

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by Trevor »

Dr. Shades wrote:They can most assuredly be guessed at and discussed by everyone else otherwise lacking behind-the-scenes information.


OK.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”

Paul Osborne

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by Paul Osborne »

Dr. Shades wrote:Rambo:

I have received permission from Lord Anubis to reveal the fact that he is absolutely **NOT** a sock puppet of Paul Osborne.


Thank you for clearing this up. I AM PAUL OSBORNE and none else!!!!

I swear by the throne of God that I am not the lord Anubis. I swear by Satan. I swear by my own throat! I swear by anything and I will cut my own head off if I'm found to be lying.

Paul O

User avatar
Mica Hunt
Sunbeam
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 3:52 pm

Re: What constitutes IRL info and what is the punishment?

Post by Mica Hunt »

Paul Osborne wrote:Bite my wire.

I would advise against trying this. My toddler bit a wire one time and was electrocuted. Thankfully, it was mild.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dr Exiled and 10 guests