canpakes wrote:You attacked the general claim about porn use by Christian men as ‘absurd’. When given a simple source of data illustrating that this seems very non-absurd, you then retreated into the convoluted protest that you were supposedly and specifically addressing only that part of the statement about this porn use happening when the wives are sleeping. Given that you can’t begin to formulate why even that would be so absurd, it’s pretty apparent that the only person desperately bouncing between unwinnable this-or-that arguments is yourself.
Nope, it was not a general claim, it was specific --> viewtopic.php?p=1145409#p1145409 and it wasn't even an attack, it was a request to justify their claim. But please, keep that goal post in motion, amiright?
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
subgenius wrote:Nope, it was not a general claim, it was specific --> viewtopic.php?p=1145409#p1145409 and it wasn't even an attack, it was a request to justify their claim. But please, keep that goal post in motion, amiright?
The claim of, ‘many’? Lol.
You’d better define your parameters for ‘many’ before you start asking for proof of it. But good luck with your bloviating.
subgenius wrote:Nope, it was not a general claim, it was specific --> viewtopic.php?p=1145409#p1145409 and it wasn't even an attack, it was a request to justify their claim. But please, keep that goal post in motion, amiright?
The claim of, ‘many’? Lol.
You’d better define your parameters for ‘many’ before you start asking for proof of it. But good luck with your bloviating.
No, the specific claim of many+good+christian+conservative+men+computers+wife+asleep. I know you think yourself clever, but you read like...
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
canpakes wrote:You’d better define your parameters for ‘many’ before you start asking for proof of it. But good luck with your bloviating.
No, the specific claim of many+good+christian+conservative+men+computers+wife+asleep. I know you think yourself clever, but you read like...
Now you’re confusing a request for you to understand what you’re asking with an attempt at ‘cleverness’. Lol.
You can dance around this one all that you like, but you still have the same problem. You need to define your parameters for ‘many’ before you start demanding proof of it from anyone. Otherwise, what would you base your belief or acceptance of any quantity on?
This goes back to your issues with language comprehension.
