Tucker Carlson and Avenatti go at it

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
_DarkHelmet
_Emeritus
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:38 pm

Re: Tucker Carlson and Avenatti go at it

Post by _DarkHelmet »

MeDotOrg wrote:In pornography the john is not on the screen, he's in the audience.


And many of them are good christian conservative men on their computers while their wife is asleep. :lol:

In regards to slut shaming, Stormy Daniels made it clear early on that she can't be slut shamed. She has never tried to hide who she is and is not ashamed of her line of work. It's ironic that many of the men who slut shame her secretly spank it to her when nobody is watching. I'm sure Tucker Carlson has searched for "stormy daniels" on pornhub at least once.
"We have taken up arms in defense of our liberty, our property, our wives, and our children; we are determined to preserve them, or die."
- Captain Moroni - 'Address to the Inhabitants of Canada' 1775
_subgenius
_Emeritus
Posts: 13326
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:50 pm

Re: Tucker Carlson and Avenatti go at it

Post by _subgenius »

DarkHelmet wrote:
MeDotOrg wrote:In pornography the john is not on the screen, he's in the audience.


And many of them are good christian conservative men on their computers while their wife is asleep. :lol:

I havent seen the science on this, i assume you are speaking from experience?

DarkHelmet wrote:In regards to slut shaming, Stormy Daniels made it clear early on that she can't be slut shamed. She has never tried to hide who she is and is not ashamed of her line of work. It's ironic that many of the men who slut shame her secretly spank it to her when nobody is watching. I'm sure Tucker Carlson has searched for "stormy daniels" on pornhub at least once.

Everyone knows the best argument against slut shaming is that it discourages that sort of behavior.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty
I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them
what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
_canpakes
_Emeritus
Posts: 8541
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:54 am

Re: Tucker Carlson and Avenatti go at it

Post by _canpakes »

subgenius wrote:
DarkHelmet wrote:And many of them are good christian conservative men on their computers while their wife is asleep.

I havent seen the science on this, i assume you are speaking from experience?

You should take the question up with these guys:
Are we really supposed to buy into the idea that 68% of men in Church watch porn regularly? Could this just be sensational rhetoric? Not according to a national survey among churches. The survey conducted over the past five years revealed that 68 percent of Christian men and 50 percent of pastors view pornography regularly.

https://conquerseries.com/why-68-percen ... atch-porn/
_subgenius
_Emeritus
Posts: 13326
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:50 pm

Re: Tucker Carlson and Avenatti go at it

Post by _subgenius »

subgenius wrote:
DarkHelmet wrote:And many of them are good christian conservative men on their computers while their wife is asleep.

I havent seen the science on this, i assume you are speaking from experience?


canpakes wrote:ou should take the question up with these guys:
Are we really supposed to buy into the idea that 68% of men in Church watch porn regularly? Could this just be sensational rhetoric? Not according to a national survey among churches. The survey conducted over the past five years revealed that 68 percent of Christian men and 50 percent of pastors view pornography regularly.

https://conquerseries.com/why-68-percen ... atch-porn/

i couldn't find your proof for "while their wife is asleep"

but sure, just put those goalposts wherever.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty
I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them
what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
_canpakes
_Emeritus
Posts: 8541
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:54 am

Re: Tucker Carlson and Avenatti go at it

Post by _canpakes »

subgenius wrote:i couldn't find your proof for "while their wife is asleep"

but sure, just put those goalposts wherever.

Let’s make sure that you know where you want to set them, then. Are you questioning the survey’s finding of 68 percent of Christian men and 50 percent of pastors viewing pornography regularly in general, or if 68 percent of Christian men and 50 percent of pastors view pornography regularly while their wives are sleeping?
_subgenius
_Emeritus
Posts: 13326
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:50 pm

Re: Tucker Carlson and Avenatti go at it

Post by _subgenius »

canpakes wrote:
subgenius wrote:i couldn't find your proof for "while their wife is asleep"

but sure, just put those goalposts wherever.

Let’s make sure that you know where you want to set them, then. Are you questioning the survey’s finding of 68 percent of Christian men and 50 percent of pastors viewing pornography regularly in general, or if 68 percent of Christian men and 50 percent of pastors view pornography regularly while their wives are sleeping?

in case you missed it:
viewtopic.php?p=1145409#p1145409
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty
I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them
what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
_canpakes
_Emeritus
Posts: 8541
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:54 am

Re: Tucker Carlson and Avenatti go at it

Post by _canpakes »

subgenius wrote:in case you missed it:
viewtopic.php?p=1145409#p1145409

Then you have no argument with the basic statistic itself. Good.

It’s just that your voyeuristic side wants to know what the wives are doing while all of those good Christian husbands view porn.
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: Tucker Carlson and Avenatti go at it

Post by _Some Schmo »

canpakes wrote:It’s just that your voyeuristic side wants to know what the wives are doing while all of those good Christian husbands view porn.

If they're good Christian women, my guess is cucumbers.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_subgenius
_Emeritus
Posts: 13326
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:50 pm

Re: Tucker Carlson and Avenatti go at it

Post by _subgenius »

canpakes wrote:
subgenius wrote:in case you missed it:
viewtopic.php?p=1145409#p1145409

Then you have no argument with the basic statistic itself. Good.

It’s just that your voyeuristic side wants to know what the wives are doing while all of those good Christian husbands view porn.

statistics was not part of that discussion, you introduced stats as a means to argue something else because the poster's claim was absurd. As usual, when "this" is unwinnable you prefer to talk about "that", which is always the introduction for your go-to last resort of any discussion.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty
I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them
what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
_canpakes
_Emeritus
Posts: 8541
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:54 am

Re: Tucker Carlson and Avenatti go at it

Post by _canpakes »

subgenius wrote:
canpakes wrote:Then you have no argument with the basic statistic itself. Good.

It’s just that your voyeuristic side wants to know what the wives are doing while all of those good Christian husbands view porn.

statistics was not part of that discussion, you introduced stats as a means to argue something else because the poster's claim was absurd. As usual, when "this" is unwinnable you prefer to talk about "that", which is always the introduction for your go-to last resort of any discussion.

You attacked the general claim about porn use by Christian men as ‘absurd’. When given a simple source of data illustrating that this seems very non-absurd, you then retreated into the convoluted protest that you were supposedly and specifically addressing only that part of the statement about this porn use happening when the wives are sleeping. Given that you can’t begin to formulate why even that would be so absurd, it’s pretty apparent that the only person desperately bouncing between unwinnable this-or-that arguments is yourself.
Post Reply