subgenius wrote:The DNC current ploy over gerrymandering is yet another indictment on their larger political failure.
Ploy? It is a statement of fact that should bother anyone who cares about the integrity of our representative democracy. It is also a fact that voter suppression laws have had a negative effect on Dem voter turnout. It is also a fact,
revealed just today, that illegal tactics using social media have been used by the Trump campaign to manipulate voters.
But you don't care about any of this because you're a political shill for the Right who cares about nothing so long as his team is in power and they're in a position to cheat in order to stay in power. Your remark about dems failing to get enough votes smacks of ignorance since they regularly get more votes and yet Republicans win more congressional seats due to gerrymandering. Your comment about the Senate also smacks of ignorance since it is the reason why Republicans only have 51% of the Senate as opposed to 56% of the House. Governorships are irrelevant. The Governor of California alone governs more people in his state than 25 Republican Governors do from Red States like South Dakota and Idaho.
How Republicans Lost the Vote and Won the House"But Republicans also benefitted from the way the districts were drawn in large swing states. There were four states without any uncontested races—Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—where the
Democratic candidates received a majority of the votes but Republican candidates won a majority of the seats. Republicans got just 49% of the vote in those four states, but won 36 seats while Democrats won just 17. That's about 10 more seats than Republicans would have been expected to win on the basis of the vote totals alone."