EAllusion wrote:Markk wrote:
You are not attacking me, you are digging the hole you are in, deeper.
Where am I being a hypocrite?
How many psychotropic med admin protocols have you written, trained, and overseen? How many people have you trained to write psychotropic med admin protocols, train others, and oversee them?
You spent a variety of posts emphasizing the inadequacy of other people's judgment due to lack of real world experience when it came to your belief that one must have physically visited Southern California to qualify as having an informed opinion on immigration effects on wage growth. You wrote many posts that were variations of insulting people using this "real world" logic. You mocked posters (and economists) for not having direct, hands-on experience that you do by virtue of living in Southern California. Then, on a separate discussion of best practice for people with pervasive mental illness struggling to maintain shelter, a subject which you have no actual real-world experience, you aggressively attack comments I made about the mere existence of successful examples of help for some otherwise homeless people. You did this even though, unlike you, I have significant real-world experience in the subject. I'm consulted for my professional knowledge, in fact. I find this to be hypocritical. There an additional layer here that your real-world argument in the former case is quite poorly thought out, but in the latter case would actually be relevant. Apparently having real-world experience only matters if it is convenient for you.
How is that hypocritical? Because you have been consulted for your professional knowledge, that makes me a hypocrite?
All you do is bloviate, as if you know what you are talking about, then change the premise when you discover your foot is in your mouth, just like you did here by redefining what a hypocrite is.
I never said one thing and did another, except for hiring illegals to do house work while bitching about them being here, and I stated that was hypocritical.
What you just wrote about is called disagreeing. Which I still disagree with. You cannot possibly understand what is happening here unless you visit here. Doc blew you away on that.
In fact, you are the hypocrite in this, in that you say that ones real life experience is not really valid, all the while saying your experience somehow qualifies you to understand what I am experiencing...even though you deny experience is necessary to understand things you have not actually experienced.
You are nothing more than a cross between a plaster saint and Cliff Clavin.
Don't take life so seriously in that " sooner or later we are just old men in funny clothes" "Tom 'T-Bone' Wolk"