disorder of assumption

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated G through PG-13.
EAllusion
God
Posts: 17547
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:39 am

Re: disorder of assumption

Post by EAllusion »

A medical condition that robs one of the mental ability to give meaningful consent does not mean that all forms of mental illness are or should be a basis for denying marriage. Arguing homosexuality is a mental illness is already wrong, but also adding that it robs one of the faculty to give consent to legal agreements is catastrophically dumb.

User avatar
Nomomo
Apostle
Posts: 777
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 9:42 pm

Re: disorder of assumption

Post by Nomomo »

Speaking of disorders ~
Amore, you have the worst case of Displacement I have ever seen. You are very seriously mentally ill Amore, and should seek help from a qualified professional experienced in dealing with severe cases of Displacement.
The Universe is stranger than we can imagine.

Amore
God
Posts: 1090
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2014 10:27 am

Re: disorder of assumption

Post by Amore »

Nomomo wrote:Speaking of disorders ~
Amore, you have the worst case of Displacement I have ever seen. You are very seriously mentally ill Amore, and should seek help from a qualified professional experienced in dealing with severe cases of Displacement.

And do you think you came up with that ad hominem attack logical fallacy all on your own - or did you realize your homosexual herd brainwashing? You speak of bullying - and yet you bully. You speak of having rights - yet you want to take away others' rights.

Let's again attempt to get to the heart of this issue:

1. Try your hardest to logically and ethically explain why society should legally promote any sexual substitutes, and why homosexual substitutes over all the other sexual substitutes.

2. Try to logically prove that homosexual behavior is healthy enough to legally encourage, while acknowledging US CDC overwhelming homosexual reports of STDs, HIV/AIDS and mental illness... as well as doctor warning of anal sex (anal fissures, anal cancer, colon rupture and bacterial infection).

3. Attempt to prove (without emotional reasoning) that mothers or fathers are useless. That 2 mothers... or 2 fathers are sufficient in raising future generations - in and by themselves without outside help.

User avatar
ludwigm
tired, less active investigator
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 2:07 am

Re: disorder of assumption

Post by ludwigm »

I repeat it without unnecessary hightlight:
Amore wrote:
Nomomo wrote:Speaking of disorders ~
Amore, you have the worst case of Displacement I have ever seen. You are very seriously mentally ill Amore, and should seek help from a qualified professional experienced in dealing with severe cases of Displacement.

And do you think you came up with that ad hominem attack logical fallacy all on your own - or did you realize your homosexual herd brainwashing? You speak of bullying - and yet you bully. You speak of having rights - yet you want to take away others' rights.

Let's again attempt to get to the heart of this issue:

[#b][#size=150]1. Try your hardest to logically and ethically explain why society should legally promote any sexual substitutes, and why homosexual substitutes over all the other sexual substitutes.

2. Try to logically prove that homosexual behavior is healthy enough to legally encourage, while acknowledging US CDC overwhelming homosexual reports of STDs, HIV/AIDS and mental illness... as well as doctor warning of anal sex (anal fissures, anal cancer, colon rupture and bacterial infection).

3. Attempt to prove (without emotional reasoning) that mothers or fathers are useless. That 2 mothers... or 2 fathers are sufficient in raising future generations - in and by themselves without outside help.[/size][/b]
... I've learned to use ### things because of discrimination by name deleted...
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei

User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 8404
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 12:54 am

Re: disorder of assumption

Post by canpakes »

Sooooo many bad assumptions...

Amore wrote:1. Try your hardest to logically and ethically explain why society should legally promote any sexual substitutes, and why homosexual substitutes over all the other sexual substitutes.

Invalid argument.
    Assumes that marriage laws are designed to promote a particular type of arbitrarily-selected sexual activity.
    Assumes that allowing marriages for both heterosexual or homosexual couples would promote homosexual unions over heterosexual unions.


Amore wrote:2. Try to logically prove that homosexual behavior is healthy enough to legally encourage, while acknowledging US CDC overwhelming homosexual reports of STDs, HIV/AIDS and mental illness... as well as doctor warning of anal sex (anal fissures, anal cancer, colon rupture and bacterial infection).

Invalid argument.
    Assumes that all homosexuals suffer from an arbitrarily selected set of ills.
    Assumes that all homosexuals practice an arbitrary list of certain activities or behaviors.
    Assumes that homosexuals are 'mentally ill' by virtue of self-identifying as homosexual.
    Assumes that homosexuals can 'transmit' mental illness or should not be married because they are 'mentally ill'.
    Assumes that the ability to marry should be predicated on assumed infection threats that one person may pose to another only within same-sex unions.


Amore wrote:3. Attempt to prove (without emotional reasoning) that mothers or fathers are useless. That 2 mothers... or 2 fathers are sufficient in raising future generations - in and by themselves without outside help.

Invalid argument.
    Assumes that s/s unions will necessarily involve parentage of children.
    Assumes that same sex unions, by default of their existence, deem mothers or fathers 'useless'.
    Assumes that s/s marriages with children do not have access to either a mother or father.
    Assumes that a capacity for effective parentage is inexorably linked only to two living biological parents of opposite sex who produce their own children.
    Assumes that heterosexual couples can always produce children and parent them effectively without 'outside help'.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B761DvpHuBw

Got anything else for us?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests