The CCC wrote:It is also an Post Hoc ergo Prompter Hoc rationalization.
What is the English translation of this?
after this, therefore, because someone reminded god of his lines?
My Favorite (to date) take down of Creationism.
-
_spotlight
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1702
- Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 1:44 am
Re: My Favorite (to date) take down of Creationism.
What is the English translation of this?
after this, therefore, because someone reminded god of his lines?
Kolob’s set time is “one thousand years according to the time appointed unto that whereon thou standest” (Abraham 3:4). I take this as a round number. - Gee
-
_spotlight
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1702
- Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 1:44 am
Re: My Favorite (to date) take down of Creationism.
The CCC wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc
you posted prompter rather than propter.
Kolob’s set time is “one thousand years according to the time appointed unto that whereon thou standest” (Abraham 3:4). I take this as a round number. - Gee
Re: My Favorite (to date) take down of Creationism.
spotlight wrote:The CCC wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc
you posted prompter rather than propter.
Fumble fingers strike again.
-
_spotlight
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1702
- Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 1:44 am
Re: My Favorite (to date) take down of Creationism.
The CCC wrote:Fumble fingers strike again.
No need for a red face over a typo, I just wondered whether you were maybe making a joke.
Kolob’s set time is “one thousand years according to the time appointed unto that whereon thou standest” (Abraham 3:4). I take this as a round number. - Gee
Re: My Favorite (to date) take down of Creationism.
spotlight wrote:The CCC wrote:Fumble fingers strike again.
No need for a red face over a typo, I just wondered whether you were maybe making a joke.
One of the few times I wasn't.