It is currently Fri Jan 19, 2018 8:27 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 322 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
PostPosted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 5:32 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 2:04 am
Posts: 3957
Location: Firmly on this earth
Lemmie wrote:
Philo Sofee wrote:
Not to resurrect This Thread facetiously however this was a spectacular trip. I hope we can get dreads like this more often here. I hope we haven't run through the whole gamut of interesting discussions.

Thanks for resurrecting a few of these threads, facetiously or not!

There are a lot of people who, for whatever reason, did not catch all of these threads the first time around; for some, many aspects of the information are new, so the indulgence of those more experienced is appreciated in allowing conversations to repeat. Although I have done a fair amount of background reading here to try to get up to speed on current topics, I am continually (and pleasantly) surprised by dormant threads that come to the surface every so often.

Me too! I mean this place is a frickin GOLD MINE

_________________
"Scientism as a criticism most often is leveled by someone who wants to suggest dogmatic, unthinking devotion to science as a strawman criticism of someone deploying science against something they'd prefer to believe." - EAllusion


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:13 pm 
Dragon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 1:15 am
Posts: 5384
Location: The Land of Lorn
Philo Sofee wrote:
Lemmie wrote:

There are a lot of people who, for whatever reason, did not catch all of these threads the first time around; for some, many aspects of the information are new, so the indulgence of those more experienced is appreciated in allowing conversations to repeat. Although I have done a fair amount of background reading here to try to get up to speed on current topics, I am continually (and pleasantly) surprised by dormant threads that come to the surface every so often.

Me too! I mean this place is a frickin GOLD MINE


You know that the comments that Don and I had on this thread turned into a long private conversation and collaboration about the KP. We discovered some new things and came to some interesting conclusions. He has his, and I, mine, but the researching and sharing we've done has benefited us both greatly. My respect and admiration for Don has only grown as a result of our conversations.

_________________
"I will not in any way, shape, or form have anything to do with or have anything to say to [grindael] from here on out. Directly OR INDIRECTLY" ~MG, 10-25-17, 12:36PM The SAME DAY, an hour later... "I decided that I needed to also create a publicly posted thread, as he did..." FIRST indirect comment. So much for his "DMZ".


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:09 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 2:04 am
Posts: 3957
Location: Firmly on this earth
Grindael

Quote:
You know that the comments that Don and I had on this thread turned into a long private conversation and collaboration about the KP. We discovered some new things and came to some interesting conclusions. He has his, and I, mine, but the researching and sharing we've done has benefited us both greatly. My respect and admiration for Don has only grown as a result of our conversations.

I second that motion he is a cool Bean.

_________________
"Scientism as a criticism most often is leveled by someone who wants to suggest dogmatic, unthinking devotion to science as a strawman criticism of someone deploying science against something they'd prefer to believe." - EAllusion


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 1:03 pm 
abstract
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:26 am
Posts: 3054
Nightlion wrote:
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
Uh. Facts do, indeed, change the way we view the world. For example, when I discovered Joseph Smith used a rock to 'receive' the Book of Mormon it completely changed the way I viewed the "translation" especially given the fact the plates, unlike they're depicted in Church art, were never used.

I don't need to Matrix-level bend reality in order to understand it. When new, incontrovertible evidence is placed before me, my understanding of reality becomes clearer.

- Doc

You do not know the facts at all. Just because Joseph Smith used a hat so he could more easily read what the Lord wrote changes nothing about the Book of Mormon. Joseph was given the plates to study and know that the book actually existed and was in need of translation. Now he could keep them safe and simply receive the dictation of the Lord being a seer he would see with the eyes of a seer. YOU DO NOT KNOW HOW A SEER SEES.

Critical thinking this is not. :rolleyes:

_________________
2 Tim 4:3 For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine.
2 Tim 4:4 They will turn their ears away from the truth & turn aside to myths


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 10:43 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 18171
Location: Koloburbia
Nightlion wrote:
YOU DO NOT KNOW HOW A SEER SEES.

Nightlion, you might even ask him to ponder:

How much stuff does a SEER SEE
when a SEER SEES his stuff?

_________________
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:59 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 2:04 am
Posts: 3957
Location: Firmly on this earth
How much seeing can a seer see,
If a seer could see the sea?
A seer could see the seeing sea
If he sees the sea of C's.....

_________________
"Scientism as a criticism most often is leveled by someone who wants to suggest dogmatic, unthinking devotion to science as a strawman criticism of someone deploying science against something they'd prefer to believe." - EAllusion


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2017 9:03 pm 
Dragon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 1:15 am
Posts: 5384
Location: The Land of Lorn
And the seer sees his saw
And the children ride along, they ride along.

_________________
"I will not in any way, shape, or form have anything to do with or have anything to say to [grindael] from here on out. Directly OR INDIRECTLY" ~MG, 10-25-17, 12:36PM The SAME DAY, an hour later... "I decided that I needed to also create a publicly posted thread, as he did..." FIRST indirect comment. So much for his "DMZ".


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 322 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Revival Theme By Brandon Designs By B.Design-Studio © 2007-2008 Brandon
Revival Theme Based off SubLite By Echo © 2007-2008 Echo
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group