It is currently Sun Dec 17, 2017 6:50 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 237 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 9:03 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 9629
Location: Multiverse
huckelberry wrote:
Maksutov wrote:
" each of the motions of the
earth was now absolutely demonstrated anew, so as to be
recognised by the ordinary observer. The parallax of fixed
stars, shown by Bessel as well as other noted astronomers in
1838, clinched forever the doctrine of the revolution of the
earth around the sun,"



Parallax pried the lid off of the heavens and the heavens became space extending out, and out, and out, and out , and out......

Just added this to say I am reading and appreciating the material.


Glad you get something out of it. :wink:

_________________
...........................................................................................
To those already disposed to suspect authority, what can be more persuasive than ideas that authority itself rejects? --Michael Barkun


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2017 8:43 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 9629
Location: Multiverse
In spite of all that has been said by these apologists,
there no longer remains the shadow of a doubt that the papal
infallibility was committed fully and irrevocably against the
double revolution of the earth. As the documents of Gali-
leo's trial now published show, Paul V, in 1616, pushed on
with all his might the condemnation of Galileo and of the
works of Copernicus and of all others teaching the motion of
the earth around its own axis and around the sun. So,
too, in the condemnation of Galileo in 1633, and in all the
proceedings which led up to it and which followed it, Urban
VIll was the central figure. Without his sanction no action
could have been taken.

True, the Pope did not formally sign the decree against
the Copernican theory then; but this came later. In 1664
Alexander VII prefixed to the Index containing the con-
demnations of the works of Copernicus and Galileo and '' all
books which affirm the motion of the earth " a papal bull
signed by himself, binding the contents of the Index upon
the consciences of the faithful. This bull confirmed and ap-
proved in express terms, finally, decisively, and infallibly,
the condemnation of " all books teaching the movement of
the earth and the stability of the sun."*

* See Rev. William W. Roberts, The Pontifical Decrees against the Doctrine



THE RETREAT OF THE CHURCH.

The position of the mother Church had been thus made
especially difficult ; and the first important move in retreat
by the apologists was the statement that Galileo was con-
demned, not because he affirmed the motion of the earth,
but because he supported it from Scripture. There was a
slight appearance of truth in this. Undoubted!}', Galileo's
letters to Castelli and the grand duchess, in which he at-
tempted to show that his astronomical doctrines were not
opposed to Scripture, gave a new stir to religious bigotry.
For a considerable time, then, this quibble served its pur-
pose ; even a hundred and fifty years after Galileo's con-
demnation it was renewed by the Protestant Mallet du Pan,
in his wish to gain favour from the older Church.

But nothing can be more absurd, in the light of the origi-
nal documents recently brought out of the Vatican archives,
than to make this contention now. The letters of Gali-
leo to Castelli and the Grand-Duchess were not published
until after the condemnation; and, although the Archbishop
of Pisa had endeavoured to use them against him, they were
but casually mentioned in 1616, and entirely left out of view
in 1633. What was condemned in 1616 by the Sacred Con-
gregation held in the presence of Pope Paul V, as ''absurd,
false in theology, and heretical, because absolutely contrary to
Holy Scripture,'' was the proposition that '' the sun is the cen-
tre about which the earth revolves " ; and what was condemned
as ''absurd, false in philosophy, and from a theologic point of
view, at least, opposed to the true faith,'' was the proposition
that " the earth is not the centre of the universe and immovable,
but has a diurnal motion."

_________________
...........................................................................................
To those already disposed to suspect authority, what can be more persuasive than ideas that authority itself rejects? --Michael Barkun


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 6:58 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 9629
Location: Multiverse
In vain did Galileo try to prove the existence of satel-
lites by showing them to the doubters through his telescope :
they either declared it impious to look, or, if they did look,
denounced the satellites as illusions from the devil. Good
Father Clavius declared that " to see satellites of Jupiter,
men had to make an instrument which would create them."
In vain did Galileo try to save the great truths he had dis-
covered by his letters to the Benedictine Castelli and the
Grand-Duchess Christine, in which he argued that literal
biblical interpretation should not be applied to science ; it
w^as answered that such an argument only made his heresy
more detestable ; that he was '* worse than Luther or Calvin."

The war on the Copernican theory which up to that
time had been carried on quietly, now flamed forth. It w^as
declared that the doctrine was proved false by the standing
still of the sun for Joshua, by the declarations that '* the
foundations of the earth are fixed so firm that they can not
be moved," and that the sun " runneth about from one end
of the heavens to the other." *

But the little telescope of Galileo still swept the heavens,
and another revelation was announced — the mountains and
valleys in the moon. This brought on another attack. It
was declared that this, and the statement that the moon
shines by light reflected from the sun, directly contradict
the statement in Genesis that the moon is *' a great light."

* For principal points as given, see Libri, Histoire des Sciences math^matiqties
en Italie, vol. iv, p. 211 ; De Morgan, Paradoxes, p. 26, for account of Father
Clavius. It is interesting to know that Clavius, in his last years, acknowledged
that " the whole system of the heavens is broken down, and must be mended,"
Cantu, Histoire Universelle, vol. xv, p. 478. See Th. Martin, Galilee, pp. 34, 208,
and 266 ; also Heller, Geschichte der Physik, Stuttgart, 1882, vol. i, p. 366. For the
original documents, see L'Epinois, pp. 34 and 36 ; or, better, Gebler's careful edi-
tion of the trial {Die Acten des Galileischen Processes, Stuttgart, 1S77), pp. 47
et seq. Martin's translation seems somewhat too free. See also Gebler, Galileo
Galilei, English translation, London, 1879, PP- 76-78 ; also Reusch, Der Process
Galilei's und die Jesuiten, Bonn, 1879, chaps, ix, x, xi.

_________________
...........................................................................................
To those already disposed to suspect authority, what can be more persuasive than ideas that authority itself rejects? --Michael Barkun


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2017 1:56 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:49 am
Posts: 7480
Location: Somewhere between bemused and curious.
Bump

_________________
"The lives we lead now are not dress rehearsals, they are the only performance we have. Therefore what matters is what we have here, the people we know and and love and the good we can do for the world"
Sean Carroll


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2017 4:09 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 9629
Location: Multiverse
Blessed Virgin, outlined on its surface mountains and val-
leys ; this was denounced as a sacrilege logically resulting
from the astronomer's heresy.

Still another struggle was aroused when the hated tele-
scope revealed spots upon the sun, and their motion indicat-
ing the sun's rotation. Monsignor Elci, head of the Univer-
sity of Pisa, forbade the astronomer Castelli to mention these
spots to his students. Father Busaeus, at the University of
Innspruck, forbade the astronomer Scheiner, who had also
discovered the spots and proposed an explanation of
them, to allow the new discovery to be known there. At
the College of Douay and the University of Louvain this
discovery was expressly placed under the ban, and this be-
came the general rule among the Catholic universities and
colleges of Europe. The Spanish universities were espe-
cially intolerant of this and similar ideas, and up to a recent
period their presentation was strictly forbidden in the most
important university of all— that of Salamanca.

Such are the consequences of placing the instruction of
men's minds in the hands of those mainly absorbed in saving
men's souls. Nothing could be more in accordance with
the idea recently put forth by sundry ecclesiastics, Catholic
and Protestant, that the Church alone is empowered to pro-
mulgate scientific truth or direct university instruction.
But science gained a victory here also. Observations of
the solar spots were reported not only from Galileo in Italy,
but from Fabricius in Holland. Father Scheiner then en-
deavoured to make the usual compromise between theology
and science. He promulgated a pseudo-scientific theory,
which only provoked derision.

The war became more and more bitter. The Dominican
Father Caccini preached a sermon from the text, " Ye men
of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven?" and this
wretched pun upon the great astronomer's name ushered in
sharper weapons ; for, before Caccini ended, he insisted that
''geometry is of the devil," and that" mathematicians should
be banished as the authors of all heresies." The Church
authorities gave Caccini promotion.



* See Ticknor, History of Spanish Literature, vol. iii.

_________________
...........................................................................................
To those already disposed to suspect authority, what can be more persuasive than ideas that authority itself rejects? --Michael Barkun


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Wed Apr 19, 2017 9:01 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 9629
Location: Multiverse
Father Lorini proved that Galileo's doctrine was not only
heretical but '-atheistic," and besought the Inquisition to
intervene. The Bishop of Fiesole screamed in rage against
the Copernican system, publicly insulted Galileo, and de-
nounced him to the Grand-Duke. The Archbishop of Pisa
secretly sought to entrap Galileo and deliver him to the In-
quisition at Rome. The Archbishop of Florence solemnly
condemned the new doctrines as unscriptural ; and Paul V,
while petting Galileo, and inviting him as the greatest astron-
omer of the world to visit Rome, was secretly moving the
Archbishop of Pisa to pick up evidence against the astron-
omer.

But by far the most terrible champion who now ap-
peared was Cardinal Bellarmin, one of the greatest theo-
logians the world has known. He was earnest, sincere,
and learned, but insisted on making science conform to
Scripture. The weapons which men of Bellarmin's stamp
used were purely theological. They held up before the
world the dreadful consequences w^hich must result to
Christian theology were the heavenly bodies proved to
revolve about the sun and not about the earth. Their
most tremendous dogmatic engine was the statement that
'' his pretended discovery vitiates the whole Christian plan
of salvation." Father Lecazre declared " it casts suspicion
on the doctrine of the incarnation." Others declared, " It
upsets the whole basis of theology. If the earth is a
planet, and only one among several planets, it can not be
that any such great things have been done specially for it as
the Christian doctrine teaches. If there are other planets,
since God makes nothing in vain, they must be inhabited ;
but how can their inhabitants be descended from Adam?
How can they trace back their origin to Noah's ark ? How
can they have been redeemed by the Saviour?" Nor was
this argument confined to the theologians of the Roman
Church ; Melanchthon, Protestant as he was, had already
used it in his attacks on Copernicus and his school.

In addition to this prodigious theological engine of war
there was kept up a fire of smaller artillery in the shape of
texts and scriptural extracts.

But the war grew still more bitter, and some weapons
used in it are worth examining. They are very easily ex-
amined, for they are to be found on all the battlefields of
science ; but on that field they were used with more effect
than on almost any other. These weapons are the epithets
" infidel " and *' atheist." They have been used against
almost every man who has ever done anything new for his
fellow-men. The list of those who have been denounced as
''infidel" and "atheist" includes almost all great men of
science, general scholars, inventors, and philanthropists.
The purest Christian life, the noblest Christian character,
have not availed to shield combatants. Christians like Isaac
Newton, Pascal, Locke, Milton, and even Fenelon and How-
ard, have had this weapon hurled against them. Of all
proofs of the existence of a God, those of Descartes have
been wrought most thoroughly into the minds of modern
men ; yet the Protestant theologians of Holland sought to
bring him to torture and to death by the charge of atheism,
and the Roman Catholic theologians of France thwarted him
during his life and prevented any due honours to him after
his death.

_________________
...........................................................................................
To those already disposed to suspect authority, what can be more persuasive than ideas that authority itself rejects? --Michael Barkun


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 7:13 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 9629
Location: Multiverse
These epithets can hardly be classed with civilized weap-
ons. They are burning arrows ; they set fire to masses of
popular prejudice, always obscuring the real question, some-
times destroying the attacking party. They are poisoned
weapons. They pierce the hearts of loving women ; they
alienate dear children ; they injure a man after life is ended,
for they leave poisoned wounds in the hearts of those who
loved him best — fears for his eternal salvation, dread of the
Divine wrath upon him. Of course, in these days these weap-
ons, though often effective in vexing good men and in scar-
ing good women, are somewhat blunted ; indeed, they not
infrequently injure the assailants more than the assailed. So
it was not in the days of Galileo ; they were then in all their
sharpness and venom.

* For various objectors and objections to Galileo by his contemporaries, see
Libri, Histoire des Sciences mathe'matiques eji Italic, vol. iv, pp. 233, 234 ; also Mar-
tin, Vie de Galilde. For Father Lecazre's argument, see Flammarion, Mondes irna-
ginaires et mo)ides r^els, 6e ed., pp. 315, 316. For Melanchthon's argument, see
his Initia, in Opera^ vol. iii, Halle, 1846.


Yet a baser warfare was waged by the Archbishop of
Pisa. This man, whose cathedral derives its most endurinof
fame from Galileo's deduction of a great natural law from
the swinging lamp before its altar, was not an archbishop
after the noble mould of Borromeo and Fenelon and Cheve-
rus. Sadly enough for the Church and humanity, he was
simply a zealot and intriguer: he perfected the plan for en-
trapping the great astronomer.

_________________
...........................................................................................
To those already disposed to suspect authority, what can be more persuasive than ideas that authority itself rejects? --Michael Barkun


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 9:10 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 9629
Location: Multiverse
Galileo, after his discoveries had been denounced, had
written to his friend Castelli and to the Grand-Duchess
Christine two letters to show that his discoveries might be
reconciled with Scripture. On a hint from the Inquisition
at Rome, the archbishop sought to get hold of these letters
and exhibit them as proofs that Galileo had uttered heretical
views of theology and of Scripture, and thus to bring him
into the clutch of the Inquisition. The archbishop begs
Castelli, therefore, to let him see the original letter in the
handwriting of Galileo. Castelli declines. The archbishop
then, while, as is now revealed, writing constantly and bit-
terly to the Inquisition against Galileo, professes to Castelli
the greatest admiration of Galileo's genius and a sincere de-
sire to know more of his discoveries. This not succeeding:,
the archbishop at last throws off the mask and resorts to
open attack.

The whole struggle to crush Galileo and to save him
would be amusing were it not so fraught with evil. There
were intrigues and counter-intrigues, plots and counter-plots,
lying and spying; and in the thickest of this seething,
squabbling, screaming mass of priests, bishops, archbishops,
and cardinals, appear two popes, Paul V and Urban VIII.
It is most suggestive to see in this crisis of the Church, at
the tomb of the prince of the apostles, on the eve of the
greatest errors in Church policy the world has known, in all
the intrigues and deliberations of these consecrated leaders
of the Church, no more evidence of the guidance or pres-
ence of the Holy Spirit than in a caucus of New York politi-
cians at Tammany Hall.

_________________
...........................................................................................
To those already disposed to suspect authority, what can be more persuasive than ideas that authority itself rejects? --Michael Barkun


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:51 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 9629
Location: Multiverse
But the opposing powers were too strong. In 1615 Gali-
leo was summoned before the Inquisition at Rome, and the
mine which had been so long preparing was sprung. Sun-
dry theologians of the Inquisition having been ordered to
examine two propositions which had been extracted from
Galileo's letters on the solar spots, solemnly considered
these points during about a month and rendered their unani-
mous decision as follows: ''The first proposition, that the sun
is the centre and does not revolve about the earth, is foolish,
absurd, false in theology, and heretical, because expressly contrary
to Holy Scripture'' ; and " the second proposition, that the earth
is not the centre but revolves about the sun, is absurd, false in
philosophy, and, from a theological point of view at least, opposed
to the true faith.''

The Pope himself, Paul V, now intervened again : he
ordered that Galileo be brought before the Inquisition.
Then the greatest man of science in that age was brought
face to face with the greatest theologian — Galileo was con-
fronted by Bellarmin. Bellarmin shows Galileo the error
of his opinion and orders him to renounce it. De Lauda,
fortified by a letter from the Pope, gives orders that the
astronomer be placed in the dungeons of the Inquisition
should he refuse to yield. Bellarmin now commands Gali-
leo, " in the name of His Holiness the Pope and the whole
Congregation of the Holy Office, to relinquish altogether
the opinion that the sun is the centre of the world and im-
movable, and that the earth moves, nor henceforth to hold,
teach, or defend it in any way whatsoever, verbally or in
writing." This injunction Galileo acquiesces in and prom-
ises to obey."

This was on the 26th of February, 1616. About a fort-
night later the Congregation of the Index, moved thereto,
as the letters and documents now brought to light show, by
Pope Paul V, solemnly rendered a decree that '* the doctrine
of the double motion of the earth about its axis and about the sun
is false and entirely contrary to Holy Scripture" ; and that
this opinion must neither be taught nor advocated. The
same decree condemned all writings of Copernicus and ''all
writings which affirm the motion of the earths The great
work of Copernicus was interdicted until corrected in ac-
cordance with the views of the Inquisition ; and the works
of Galileo and Kepler, though not mentioned by name at
that time, were included among those implicitly condemned
as "affirming the motion of the earth."

_________________
...........................................................................................
To those already disposed to suspect authority, what can be more persuasive than ideas that authority itself rejects? --Michael Barkun


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:06 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 9629
Location: Multiverse
The condemnations were inscribed upon the Index; and,
finally, the papacy committed itself as an infallible judge
and teacher to the world by prefixing to the Index the usual
papal bull giving its monitions the most solemn papal sanc-
tion. To teach or even read the works denounced or pas-
sages condemned was to risk persecution in this world and
damnation in the next. Science had apparently lost the
decisive battle.

For a time after this judgment Galileo remained in Rome,
apparently hoping to find some way out of this difficulty ;
but he soon discovered the hollowness of the protestations
made to him by ecclesiastics, and, being recalled to Flor-
ence, remained in his hermitage near the city in silence,
working steadily, indeed, but not publishing anything save
by private letters to friends in various parts of Europe.

But at last a better vista seemed to open for him. Car-
dinal Barberini, who had seemed liberal and friendly be-
came pope under the name of Urban VIII. Galileo at this
conceived new hopes, and allowed his continued allegiance
to the Copernican system to be known. New troubles en-
sued. Galileo was induced to visit Rome again, and Pope
Urban tried to cajole him into silence, personally taking the
trouble to show^ him his errors by argument. Other op-
ponents were less considerate, for works appeared attacking
his ideas — works all the more unmanly, since their authors
knew that Galileo was restrained by force from defending
himself. Then, too, as if to accumulate proofs of the unfit-
ness of the Church to take charge of advanced instruction,
his salary as a professor at the University of Pisa was taken
from him, and sapping and mining began. Just as the Arch-
bishop of Pisa some years before had tried to betray him
with honeyed words to the Inquisition, so now Father
Grassi tried it, and, after various attempts to draw him out
by flattery, suddenly denounced his scientific ideas as "lead-
ing to a denial of the Real Presence in the Eucharist."

_________________
...........................................................................................
To those already disposed to suspect authority, what can be more persuasive than ideas that authority itself rejects? --Michael Barkun


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2017 7:36 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 9629
Location: Multiverse
For the final assault upon him a park of heavy artillery
was at last w^heeled into place. It may be seen on all the
scientific battlefields. It consists of general denunciation ;
and in 163 1 Father Melchior Inchofer, of the Jesuits, brought
his artillery to bear upon Galileo with this declaration :
" The opinion of the earth's motion is of all heresies the most
abominable, the most pernicious, the most scandalous ; the
immovability of the earth is thrice sacred ; argument against
the immortality of the soul, the existence of God, and the
incarnation, should be tolerated sooner than an argument to
prove that the earth moves."

From the other end of Europe came a powerful echo.
From the shadow of the Cathedral of Antwerp, the noted
theologian Fromundus gave forth his famous treatise, the
Ant-Aristarchus. Its very title-page was a contemptuous
insult to the memory of Copernicus, since it paraded the as-
sumption that the new truth was only an exploded theory
of a pagan astronomer. Fromundus declares that sacred
Scripture fights against the Copernicans." To prove that
the sun revolves about the earth, he cites the passage in the
Psalms which speaks of the sun " which cometh forth as a
bridegroom out of his chamber." To prove that the earth
stands still, he quotes a passage from Ecclesiastes, *' The
earth standeth fast forever." To show the utter futility of
the Copernican theory, he declares that, if it were true, " the
wind would constantly blow from the east " ; and that
'' buildings and the earth itself would fly off with such a
rapid motion that men would have to be provided with claws
like cats to enable them to hold fast to the earth's surface."
Greatest weapon of all, he works up, by the use of Aristotle
and St. Thomas Aquinas, a demonstration from theology
and science combined, that the earth must stand in the cen-
tre, and that the sun must revolve about it.* Nor was it
merely fanatics who opposed the truth revealed by Coper-
nicus ; such strong men as Jean Bodin, in France, and Sir
Thomas Browne, in England, declared against it as evidently
contrary to Holy Scripture.

_________________
...........................................................................................
To those already disposed to suspect authority, what can be more persuasive than ideas that authority itself rejects? --Michael Barkun


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2017 1:28 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 9629
Location: Multiverse
IV. VICTORY OF THE CHURCH OVER GALILEO.

While news of triumphant attacks upon him and upon
the truth he had established were coming in from all parts
of Europe, Galileo prepared a careful treatise in the form of
a dialogue, exhibiting the arguments for and against the
Copernican and Ptolemaic systems, and offered to submit to
any conditions that the Church tribunals might impose, if
they would allow it to be printed. At last, after discussions
which extended through eight years, they consented, impos-
ing a humiliating condition — a preface written in accord-
ance with the ideas of Father Ricciardi, Master of the Sacred
Palace, and signed by Galileo, in which the Copernican
theory was virtually exhibited as a play of the imagination,
and not at all as opposed to the Ptolemaic doctrine reassert-
ed in 1616 by the Inquisition under the direction of Pope
Paul V.

This new work of Galileo — the Dialogo — appeared in 1632,
and met with prodigious success. It put new weapons into
the hands of the supporters of the Copernican theory. The
pious preface was laughed at from one end of Europe to the
other. This roused the enemy ; the Jesuits, Dominicans,

* For Father Inchofer's attack, see his Tractatus Sylleptictis, cited in Galileo's
letter to Deodati, July 28, 1634. For Fromundus's more famous attack, see his
Ant-Aristarchics, already cited, passim, but especially the heading of chapter vi,
and the argument in chapters x and xi. A copy of this work may be found in the
Astor Library at New York, and another in the White Library at Cornell Univer-
sity. For interesting reference to one of Fromundus's arguments, showing, by a
mixture of mathematics and theology, that the earth is the centre of the universe,
see Quetelet, Histoire des Sciences math^matiques et physiques, Bruxelles, 1S64, p.
170; also Madler, Geschichte der Astronomic, vol. i, p. 274. For Bodin's opposi-
tion to the Copernican theory, see Hallam, Literature of Europe \ also Lecky.
For Sir Thomas Browne, see his Vulgar and Common Errors, book iv, chap, v ;
and as to the real reason for his disbelief in the Copernican view, see Dr. John-
son's preface to his Life of Browne, vol. i, p. xix, of his collected works.



and the great majority of the clergy returned to the attack
more violent than ever, and in the midst of them stood Pope
Urban VIII, most bitter of all. His whole power was now
thrown against Galileo. He was touched in two points:
first, in his personal vanity, for Galileo had put the Pope's
arguments into the mouth of one of the persons in the dia-
logue and their refutation into the mouth of another ; but,
above all, he was touched in his religious feelings. Again
and again His Holiness insisted to all comers on the absolute
and specific declarations of Holy Scripture, which prove
that the sun and heavenly bodies revolve about the earth,
and declared that to gainsay them is simply to dispute rev-
elation. Certainly, if one ecclesiastic more than another
ever seemed not under the care of the Spirit of Truth, it was
Urban VIII in all this matter.

Herein was one of the greatest pieces of ill fortune that
has ever befallen the older Church. Had Pope Urban been
broad-minded and tolerant like Benedict XIV, or had he
been taught moderation by adversity like Pius VII, or had
he possessed the large scholarly qualities of Leo XIII, now
reio:ninor the vast scandal of the Galileo case would never
have burdened the Church : instead of devising endless quib-
bles and special pleadings to escape responsibility for this
colossal blunder, its defenders could have claimed forever
for the Church the glory of fearlessly initiating a great
epoch in human thought.

But it was not so to be. Urban was not merely Pope ;
he was also a prince of the house of Barberini, and therefore
doubly angry that his arguments had been publicly con-
troverted.

_________________
...........................................................................................
To those already disposed to suspect authority, what can be more persuasive than ideas that authority itself rejects? --Michael Barkun


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2017 12:21 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 9629
Location: Multiverse
The opening strategy of Galileo's enemies was to forbid
the sale of his work ; but this was soon seen to be unavail-
ing, for the first edition had already been spread throughout
Europe. Urban now became more angry than ever, and
both Galileo and his works were placed in the hands of
the Inquisition. In vain did the good Benedictine Castelli
urge that Galileo was entirely respectful to the Church; in
vain did he insist that " nothing that can be done can now
hinder the earth from revolving." He was dismissed in dis-
grace, and Galileo was forced to appear in the presence of
the dread tribunal without defender or adviser. There, as
was so long- concealed, but as is now fully revealed, he was
menaced with torture again and again by express order of
Pope Urban, and, as is also thoroughly established from the
trial documents themselves, forced to abjure under threats,
and subjected to imprisonment by command of the Pope ;
the Inquisition deferring in this whole matter to the papal
authority. All the long series of attempts made in the sup-
posed interest of the Church to mystify these transactions
have at last failed. The world knows now that Galileo was
subjected certainly to indignity, to imprisonment, and to
threats equivalent to torture, and was at last forced to pro-
nounce publicly and on his knees his recantation, as follows :

"I, Galileo, being in my seventieth year, being a prisoner
and on my knees, and before your Eminences, having before
my eyes the Holy Gospel, which I touch with my hands,
abjure, curse, and detest the error and the heresy of the
movement of the earth."

He was vanquished indeed, for he had been forced, in
the face of all coming ages, to perjure himself. To com-
plete his dishonour, he was obliged to swear that he would
denounce to the Inquisition any other man of science whom
he should discover to be supporting the "heresy of the mo-
tion of the earth."

Many have wondered at this abjuration, and on account
of it have denied to Galileo the title of martyr. But let such
gainsayers consider the circumstances. Here was an old
man — one who had reached the allotted threescore years
and ten — broken with disappointments, worn out with la-
bours and cares, dragged from Florence to Rome, with the
threat from the Pope himself that if he delayed he should be
"brought in chains"; sick in body and mind, given over

* For various utterances of Pope Urban against the Copernican theory at this
period, see extracts from the original documents given by Gebler. For punish-
ment of those who had shown some favour to Galileo, see various citations, and
especially those from the Vatican manuscript, Gebler, p, 216. As to the text of
the abjuration, see L'Epinois ; also Polacco, Afiticopcrjiiciis, etc., Venice, 1644 ;
and for a discussion regarding its publication, see Favaro, Miscellanea Galileana,
p. 804. It is not probable that torture in the ordinary sense was admiristered
to Galileo, though it was threatened. See Th. Martin, Vie de GaliUe, for a fair sum-
ming up of the case.


to his oppressors by the Grand-Duke who ought to have pro-
tected him, and on his arrival in Rome threatened with tor-
ture. What the Inquisition was he knew well He could
remember as but of yesterday the burning of Giordano Bruno
in that same city for scientific and philosophic heresy ; he
could remember, too, that only eight years before this very
time De Dominis, Archbishop of Spalatro, having been
seized by the Inquisition for scientific and other heresies,
had died in a dungeon, and that his body and his writings
had been publicly burned.

_________________
...........................................................................................
To those already disposed to suspect authority, what can be more persuasive than ideas that authority itself rejects? --Michael Barkun


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2017 8:56 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 9629
Location: Multiverse
To the end of his life— nay, after his life was ended— the
persecution of Galileo was continued. He was kept in exile
from his family, from his friends, from his noble employ-
ments, and was held rigidly to his promise not to speak of
his theory. When, in the midst of intense bodily sufferings
from disease, and mental sufferings from calamities in his
family, he besought some little liberty, he was met with
threats of committal to a dungeon. When, at last, a special
commission had reported to the ecclesiastical authorities that
he had become blind and wasted with disease and sorrow,
he was allowed a little more liberty, but that little was ham'
pered by close surveillance. He was forced to bear con-
temptible attacks on himself and on his works in silence ; to
see the men who had befriended him severely punished ;
Father Castelli banished ; Ricciardi, the Master of the
Sacred Palace, and Ciampoli, the papal secretary, thrown
out of their positions by Pope Urban, and the Inquisitor at
Florence reprimanded for having given permission to print
Galileo's work. He lived to see the truths he had estab-
lished carefully weeded out from all the Church colleges and
universities in Europe ; and, when in a scientific work he
happened to be spoken of as " renowned," the Inquisition
ordered the substitution of the word " notorious." -

And now measures were taken to complete the destruc-
tion of the Copernican theory, with Galileo's proofs of it.
On the 16th of June, 1633, the Holy Congregation, with the
permission of the reigning Pope, ordered the sentence upon

* For the substitution of the word " notorious " for " renowned " by order of the
Inquisition, see Martin, p. 227.


Galileo, and his recantation, to be sent to all the papal
nuncios throughout Europe, as well as to all archbishops,
bishops, and inquisitors in Italy ; and this document gave
orders that the sentence and abjuration be made known " to
your vicars, that you and all professors of philosophy and
mathematics may have knowledge of it, that they may know
why we proceeded against the said Galileo, and recognise
the gravity of his error, in order that they may avoid it, and
thus not incur the penalties which they would have to suffer
in case they fell into the same."

As a consequence, the professors of mathematics and
astronomy in various universities of Europe were assem-
bled and these documents were read to them. To the theo-
logical authorities this gave great satisfaction. The Rec-
tor of the University of Douay, referring to the opinion of
Galileo, wrote to the papal nuncio at Brussels : " The profess-
ors of our university are so opposed to this fanatical opin-
ion that they have always held that it must be banished from
the schools. In our English college at Douay this paradox-
has never been approved and never will be."

_________________
...........................................................................................
To those already disposed to suspect authority, what can be more persuasive than ideas that authority itself rejects? --Michael Barkun


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Sat May 06, 2017 7:22 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 9629
Location: Multiverse
Still another step was taken : the Inquisitors were or-
dered, especially in Italy, not to permit the publication of a
new edition of any of Galileo's works, or of any similar writ-
ings. On the other hand, theologians were urged, now that
Copernicus and Galileo and Kepler were silenced, to reply
to them with tongue and pen. Europe was flooded with
these theological refutations of the Copernican system.

To make all complete, there was prefixed to the Index
of the Church, forbidding ''all writings which affirm the
motion of the earth," a bull signed by the reigning Pope,
which, by virtue of his infallibility as a divinely guided
teacher in matters of faith and morals, clinched this con-
demnation into the consciences of the whole Christian
world.

From the mass of books which appeared under the
auspices of the Church immediately after the condemnation


* For a copy of this document, see Gebler, p. 269, As to the spread of this
and similar documents notifying Europe of Galileo's condemnation, see Favaro,
pp. 804, 805.



of Galileo, for the purpose of rooting out every vestige of
the hated Copernican theory from the mind of the world,
two may be taken as typical. The first of these was a work
by Scipio Chiaramonti, dedicated to Cardinal Barberini.
Among his arguments against the double motion of the
earth may be cited the following :

''Animals, which move, have limbs and muscles ; the
earth has no limbs or muscles, therefore it does not move.
It is angels who make Saturn, Jupiter, the sun, etc., turn
round. If the earth revolves, it must also have an angel in
the centre to set it in motion ; but only devils live there ; it
would therefore be a devil who would impart motion to the
earth. . . .

" The planets, the sun, the fixed stars, all belong to one
species — namely, that of stars. It seems, therefore, to be a
grievous wrong to place the earth, which is a sink of im-
purity, among these heavenly bodies, which are pure and
divine things."

_________________
...........................................................................................
To those already disposed to suspect authority, what can be more persuasive than ideas that authority itself rejects? --Michael Barkun


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 8:10 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 9629
Location: Multiverse
The next, which I select from the mass of similar works,
is the Anticopernicus Polacco. It was intended
to deal a finishing stroke at Galileo's heresy. In this it is
declared :

* The Scripture always represents the earth as at rest,
and the sun and moon as in motion ; or, if these latter bodies
are ever represented as at rest. Scripture represents this as
the result of a great miracle. . . .

** These writings must be prohibited, because the}^ teach
certain principles about the position and motion of the ter-
restrial globe repugnant to Holy Scripture and to the Cath-
olic interpretation of it, not as hypotheses but as established
facts. ..."


Speaking of Galileo's book, Polacco says that it "smacked
of Copernicanism," and that, " when this was shown to the
Inquisition, Galileo was thrown into prison and was com-
pelled to utterly abjure the baseness of this erroneous
dogma."

As to the authority of the cardinals in their decree, Po-
lacco asserts that, since they are the '' Pope's Council " and
his " brothers," their work is one, except that the Pope is
favoured with special divine enlightenment.

Having shown that the authority of the Scriptures, of
popes, and of cardinals is against the new astronomy, he
gives a refutation based on physics. He asks : '' If we con-
cede the motion of the earth, why is it that an arrow shot
into the air falls back to the same spot, while the earth and
all things on it have in the meantime moved very rapidly
toward the east? Who does not see that great confusion
'. would result from this motion ? "

Next he argues from metaphysics, as follows : " The Co-
pernican theory of the earth's motion is against the nature
of the earth itself, because the earth is not only cold but
contains in itself the principle of cold ; but cold is opposed
to motion, and even destroys it — as is evident in animals,
which become motionless when they become cold."

Finally, he clinches all with a piece of theological reason-
ing, as follows : " Since it can certainly be gathered from
Scripture that the heavens move above the earth, and since
a circular motion requires something immovable around
which to move, . . . the earth is at the centre of the uni-
verse."

_________________
...........................................................................................
To those already disposed to suspect authority, what can be more persuasive than ideas that authority itself rejects? --Michael Barkun


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 7:51 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 9629
Location: Multiverse
But any sketch of the warfare between theology and
science in this field would be incomplete without some ref-
erence to the treatment of Galileo after his death. He had
begged to be buried in his family tomb in Santa Croce ;
this request was denied. His friends wished to erect a
monument over him ; this, too, was refused. Pope Urban
said to the ambassador Niccolini that " it would be an evil
example for the world if such honours were rendered to a
man who had been brought before the Roman Inquisition
for an opinion so false and erroneous; who had communi-
cated it to many others, and who had given so great a scan-
dal to Christendom." In accordance, therefore, with the
wish of the Pope and the orders of the Inquisition, Galileo
was buried ignobly, apart from his family, without fitting
ceremony, without monument, without epitaph. Not until
forty years after did Pierrozzi dare write an inscription

* For Chiaramonti's book and selections given, see Gebler as above, p. 271.
For Polacco, see his work as cited, especially Assertiones i, ii, vii, xi, xiii, Ixxiii,
clxxxvii, and others. The work is in the White Library at Cornell University.
The date of it is 1644.



to be placed above his bones ; not until a hundred years
after did Nelli dare transfer his remains to a suitable
position in Santa Croce, and erect a monument above
them. Even then the old conscientious hostility burst
forth : the Inquisition was besought to prevent such hon-
ours to ''a man condemned for notorious errors" ; and that
tribunal refused to allow any epitaph to be placed above
him which had not been submitted to its censorship. Nor
has that old conscientious consistency in hatred yet fully
relented : hardly a generation since has not seen some eccle-
siastic, like Marini or De Bonald or Rallaye or De Gabriac,
suppressing evidence, or torturing expressions, or inventing
theories to blacken the memory of Galileo and save the
reputation of the Church. Nay, more: there are school his-
tories, widely used, which, in the supposed interest of the
Church, misrepresent in the grossest manner all these trans-
actions in which Galileo was concerned. Sancta simp licit as !
The Church has no worse enemies than those who devise
and teach these perversions. They are simply rooting out,
in the long run, from the minds of the more thoughtful
scholars, respect for the great organization which such writ-
ings are supposed to serve.*

_________________
...........................................................................................
To those already disposed to suspect authority, what can be more persuasive than ideas that authority itself rejects? --Michael Barkun


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2017 7:54 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 9629
Location: Multiverse
The Protestant Church was hardly less energetic against
this new astronomy than the mother Church. The sacred
science of the first Lutheran Reformers was transmitted as
a precious legacy, and in the next century was made much
of by Calovius. His great learning and determined ortho-
doxy gave him the Lutheran leadership. Utterly refusing
to look at ascertained facts, he cited the turning back of the
shadow upon King Hezekiah's dial and the standing still
of the sun for Joshua, denied the movement of the earth,
and denounced the whole new view as clearly opposed to
Scripture, To this day his arguments are repeated by sun-
dry orthodox leaders of American Lutheranism.

* For the persecutions of Galileo's memory after his death, see Gebler and
Wohlwill, but especially Th. Martin, p. 243 and chaps, ix and x. For documentary
proofs, see L'Epinois. For a collection of the slanderous theories invented against
Galileo, see Martin, final chapters and appendix. Both these authors are devoted
to the Church, but, unlike Monsignor Marini, are too upright to resort to the pious
fraud of suppressing documents or interpolating pretended facts.


As to the Other branches of the Reformed Church, we
have already seen how Calvinists, Anglicans, and, indeed,
Protestant sectarians generally, opposed the new truth. "In
England, among the strict churchmen, the great Dr. South
denounced the Royal Society as "irreligious," and among
the Puritans the eminent John Owen declared that New-
ton's discoveries were " built on fallible phenomena and ad-
vanced by many arbitrary presumptions against evident
testimonies of Scripture." Even Milton seems to have hesi-
tated between the two systems. At the beginning of the
eighth book of Paradise Lost he makes Adam state the diffi-
culties of the Ptolemaic system, and then brings forward an
angel to make the usual orthodox answers. Later, Milton
seems to lean toward the Copernican theory, for, referring
to the earth, he says :

" Or she from west her silent course advance
With inoffensive pace, that spinning sleeps
On her soft axle, while she faces even
And bears thee soft with the smooth air along."

_________________
...........................................................................................
To those already disposed to suspect authority, what can be more persuasive than ideas that authority itself rejects? --Michael Barkun


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2017 9:16 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 9629
Location: Multiverse
English orthodoxy continued to assert itself. In 1724
John Hutchinson, professor at Cambridge, published his
Moses Principia, a system of philosophy' in which he sought
to build up a complete physical system of the universe from
the Bible. In this he assaulted the Newtonian theory as
"atheistic," and led the way for similar attacks by such
Church teachers as Home, Duncan Forbes, and Jones of
Nayland. But one far greater than these involved himself
in this view. That same limitation of his reason by the sim-
ple statements of Scripture which led John Wesley to de-
clare that, " unless witchcraft is true, nothing in the Bible is
true," led him, while giving up the Ptolemaic theory and
accepting in a general way the Copernican, to suspect the
demonstrations of Newton. Happily, his inborn nobility of
character* lifted him above an}' bitterness or persecuting
spirit, or any imposition of doctrinal tests which could pre-
vent those who came after him from finding their way to
the truth.

* For Calovius, see Zoeckler, Geschichie, vol. i, pp. 684 and 763. For Calvin
and Turretin, see Shields, The Final Philosophy, pp. 60, 61.


But in the midst of this vast expanse of theologic error
signs of right reason began to appear, both in England and
America. Noteworthy is it that Cotton Mather, bitter as
was his orthodoxy regarding witchcraft, accepted, in 1721,
the modern astronomy fully, with all its consequences.

In the following year came an even more striking evi-
dence that the new scientific ideas were making their way
in England. In 1722 Thomas Burnet published the sixth
edition of his Sacred Theory of tJie Earth. In this he argues,
as usual, to establish the scriptural doctrine of the earth's
stability ; but in his preface he sounds a remarkable warn-
ing. He mentions the great mistake into which St. Augus-
tine led the Church regarding the doctrine of the antipodes,
and says, *' If within a few years or in the next generation it
should prove as certain and demonstrable that the earth is
moved, as it is now that there are antipodes, those that have
been zealous against it, and engaged the Scripture in the
controversy, would have the same reason to repent of their
forwardness that St. Augustine would now, if he were still
alive."

_________________
...........................................................................................
To those already disposed to suspect authority, what can be more persuasive than ideas that authority itself rejects? --Michael Barkun


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2017 6:13 pm 
God

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 10:49 am
Posts: 4278
The "church" held too tightly to TRADITION rather than to the Holy Bible: http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-c007.html


Last edited by LittleNipper on Thu May 11, 2017 4:10 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Warfare of Science with Theology by A. D. White
PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2017 7:26 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 7:29 pm
Posts: 3444
LittleNipper wrote:
The "church" held to tightly to TRADITION rather than to the Holy Bible: http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-c007.html


Nipper, what do you think about what is being said in this book the thread is following? I read that a a variety of protestants were against Galileo not just Catholics . The arguments presented against Galilio are primarily Biblical. He was accused of undermining Biblical authority. Yes the system the Catholics favored was Aristotle's but all these people thought that system fit the Bible and Copernicus did not.

Nowdays we are all used to not reading the problem Bible passages literally so have grown comfortable with thinking the earth revolves on its axis.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 237 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: LittleNipper and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Revival Theme By Brandon Designs By B.Design-Studio © 2007-2008 Brandon
Revival Theme Based off SubLite By Echo © 2007-2008 Echo
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group