From ''Online Posting Existentialism: Why are You Here at MD?''

Jersey Girl · **Posted:** Tue Nov 28, 2017 5:08 pm

Yahoo Bot wrote:

One final note -- if you don't want your decision to go gay not be a subject of public discussion, you shouldn't have brought it up and discuss your family at the same time. You brought it up. Given the very vicious and false personal things you say about Dr. Peterson I'm rather surprised that you'd care much. You shouldn't have gone gay in the first place, in my view, and disappoint your family. But, I'd say the same thing to a gay who decided to go straight and disappoint a life companion.

He didn't "go gay". He was always gay.

Did you "go heterosexual"? :rolleyes:

Jesse Pinkman · **Joined:** Sat Oct 05, 2013 7:58 pm **Posts:** 2693

Dr. Shades wrote:

Yahoo Bot wrote:

I've been banned by Shades for 30 days for doing nothing more than saying that I could go into a public court file and refute something a board member was saying about a church-affiliated entity.

No, you were temporarily suspended (not "banned") for refusing to cease-and-desist from using red font, which is reserved for moderators.

Shades is correct. Get your facts straight, Bot.

Jesse Pinkman · **Joined:** Sat Oct 05, 2013 7:58 pm **Posts:** 2693

Jersey Girl wrote:

Yahoo Bot wrote:

One final note -- if you don't want your decision to go gay not be a subject of public discussion, you shouldn't have brought it up and discuss your family at the same time. You brought it up. Given the very vicious and false personal things you say about Dr. Peterson I'm rather surprised that you'd care much. You shouldn't have gone gay in the first place, in my view, and disappoint your family. But, I'd say the same thing to a gay who decided to go straight and disappoint a life companion.

He didn't "go gay". He was always gay.

Did you "go heterosexual"? :rolleyes:

This just shows how little he knows about the situation. No big surprise there. Paul didn’t openly pursue a gay lifestyle until after his wife LEFT HIM. If she had never left, he would probably still be married.

I personally think it’s good that they did divorce. It sounds like they are both a lot happier and have found some peace.

As far as Bot claiming that Paul abandoned and/or disappointed his family, Bot is simply being an arrogant asshole. Bot doesn’t know Paul’s family, and has no idea whether or not his family felt abandoned or disappointed by Paul’s coming out. I do know that Paul was always there for his kids, so again, Bot is an ass to suggest that he abandoned his family in any way.

Maksutov · **Posted:** Tue Nov 28, 2017 5:39 pm

Jesse Pinkman wrote:

This just shows how little he knows about the situation. No big surprise there. Paul didn’t openly pursue a gay lifestyle until after his wife LEFT HIM. If she had never left, he would probably still be married.

I personally think it’s good that they did divorce. It sounds like they are both a lot happier and have found some peace.

As far as Bot claiming that Paul abandoned and/or disappointed his family, Bot is simply being an arrogant asshole. Bot doesn’t know Paul’s family, and has no idea whether or not his family felt abandoned or disappointed by Paul’s coming out. I do know that Paul was always there for his kids, so again, Bot is an ass to suggest that he abandoned his family in any way.

Yeah, we leave so that we can sin. Nobody staying in the church has ever sinned or is sinning now. Actually, we leave so that we can be ourselves and make our own lives. And some self-righteous, ignorant, arrogant douche appoints themselves your judge. Of course.

Lemmie · **Joined:** Sun Apr 05, 2015 1:25 pm **Posts:** 7392

Kishkumen wrote:

Maksutov wrote:

You're here because you belong here....with the drunks, homosexuals (not that there is anything wrong with it), divorcees, seedy professors, seedy retired professors, thin-skinned and anonymous cowards. You're attracted to this board and us. Sounds like something to talk to your therapist or bishop about. :lol:

I love the fact that in Bot's eyes we are not very nice people. What a compliment!

Well, he did admit he watches us in an effort to learn how to reduce his own dysfunctions. We must be good examples.

Doctor CamNC4Me · **Joined:** Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:02 am **Posts:** 17243

I love how the wonky-eyed Leopard of the Year loves to, what is it, 'throw turds at a synagogue', so to speak?

So, this is it. This is the state of Mopologetics these days. I kind of miss the early 2000's when, full of the Spirit and their own hubris, people like Yahoo Bot would attempt to argue their case. Utterly defeated, the only thing left to do these days is preach woo, god-of-the-gaps, or lob an insult or two because impotence is a difficult thing to compartmentalize.

- Doc

Yahoo Bot · **Joined:** Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:37 pm **Posts:** 3185

Dr. Shades wrote:

Yahoo Bot wrote:

I've been banned by Shades for 30 days for doing nothing more than saying that I could go into a public court file and refute something a board member was saying about a church-affiliated entity.

No, you were temporarily suspended (not "banned") for refusing to cease-and-desist from using red font, which is reserved for moderators.

You are so wrong. That's ok.

Dr. Shades · **Posted:** Tue Nov 28, 2017 8:28 pm

Yahoo Bot wrote:

You are so wrong. That's ok.

In that case, please enlighten me: What was the event that finally, at LONG last, convinced you to quit using red font and typing "Moderator note:" . . . ?

cwald · **Posted:** Tue Nov 28, 2017 8:30 pm

Yahoo Bot wrote:

Get over it. The OP was absurdly boring.

Yeah. I have to agree. This thread is way more interesting and entertaining than the Terrestrial thread. Thanks for the "humorous" derail Bot and getting this topic moved down here where you can pretty well say ____ off to whomever at any given time.

Shulem · **Joined:** Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:48 pm **Posts:** 7751

cwald wrote:

down here where you can pretty well say ____ off to whomever at any given time.

Yeah, hahahaha, hahahahah, ____ off!

canpakes · **Joined:** Wed Dec 07, 2011 12:54 am **Posts:** 5791

Yahoo Bot wrote:

... where their testimony lies.

Indeed.

From ''Online Posting Existentialism: Why are You Here at MD?''

Who is online