The Book of Mormon is White Apologetics for the New World

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Meadowchik
_Emeritus
Posts: 1900
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:00 am

The Book of Mormon is White Apologetics for the New World

Post by _Meadowchik »

The Book of Mormon is of the sort that grossly misrepresents the history of native Americans. Perhaps, this is ultimately its worst offense.

From reddit:

The entire premise of the Book of Mormon is based on the prevalent racism of Colonial times. Newcomers saw vestiges of these advanced native civilizations and believed they must have been white.

The Book of Mormon reframes the American story, erasing the massive tragedy of genocidal proportions, an unimaginable loss of hundreds of tribal nations and a loss for all of mankind. It frames this as the inspired work of a loving God who rewards goodness with lightened skin and with American soil. The colonists, and then us, could then think of themselves as blessed, entitled to inherit, rightful beneficiaries.

Then they could then "rightfully" move in and defend ever-expanding territories as their own with brutal force. In a way, Americans are still doing it today, with treatment of indigenous peoples already within our borders and those coming here for help.

https://www.reddit.com/r/exmormon/comme ... s_for_the/

And for references:

American exceptionalism is woven together with white nationalism. The Book of Mormon is not the only work contemporary to Joseph Smith that tried to give American tribes a white origin story, specifically a Lost Tribe of Israel story. View of the Hebrews is a remarkable example of this, but there were many more works before Jsoeph's time and during his lifetime written that tried connecting the Lost Tribes of Israel to origins of native American civilisations. Sandra Tanner's website has a list: http://www.utlm.org/onlineresources/Book of Mormon ... rigins.htm

From the link at Utah Lighthouse Ministries:

"The claims of Israelite origins, Hebrew and Egyptian writing, knowledge of the wheel, use of the horse, Freemasonry, a white race destroyed by the Indians, etc., have been refuted by current scholars. But the existence and popularity of so many books making these claims prior to the publishing of the Book of Mormon demonstrates that Smith could have gotten his ideas for the Book of Mormon from sources in his community."

and:

Adair, James, The History of the American Indians, London, 1775.

Adair’s evidence for the Indian-Israelite theory consists of twenty-three parallels between Indian and Jewish customs. For example, he claims the Indians spoke a corrupt form of Hebrew, honored the Jewish Sabbath, performed circumcision, and offered animal sacrifice.
Boudinot, Elias, A Star in the West; or a Humble Attempt to Discover the Long Lost Ten Tribes of Israel, Trenton, 1816.

He relies heavily on evidences compiled by James Adair. He also mentions the Indians’ lost book of God.
Burke, Edmund, An Account of the European Settlements in America, 2 vol. 2nd ed., London, 1758 — many editions including one in 1808.

Mentions the Mexican and Peruvian temples.
Cusick, David, Sketches of the Ancient History of the Six Nations, Lewistone, NY, 1827.

Records Indian fables, which he believes, support the mound builder myth. One fable, for example, speaks of the descendants of two brothers continually at war with the other until one group is finally destroyed in North America.
Flint, Timothy, Recollections of the Last Ten Years, Passed in Occasional Residences and Journeyings in the Valley of the Mississippi, Boston, 1826.

He mentions the idea that the Indians were Jewish but does not commit himself on the subject. He describes various burial mounds and fortifications of North America and mentions the discovery of mammoth bones and stone coffins.
Haywood, John, The Natural and Aboriginal History of Tennessee, Nashville, 1823.

Compares American antiquities with those of Hindus, Egyptians, and Hebrews. He describes North American fortifications and Mexican temples, use of metals, including steel, copper and brass plates, describes stone boxes, possible use of the wheel and horse in ancient America, and concludes that the mound builders were a white people destroyed by the Indians.
Humboldt, Alexander, three different books on American Indian; one 4 vol. set was titled Political Essay on the Kingdom of New Spain. Baltimore, 1813.

Describes Mexican fortifications and temples, use of metals.
Imlay, George, A Topographical Description of the Western Territory of North America, London, 1793.

Discusses, among other things, the practice of the mound builders to bury their dead in stone boxes.
Israel, Manasseh ben, The Hope of Israel, London, 1652 and 1792.

Includes story of a remnant of the ten tribes of Israel being discovered in Peru.
Juarros, Domingo, A Statistical and Commercial History of the Kingdom of Guatemala, London, 1823.

Claims Indians from the Old World, claims original inhabitants arrived in the New World shortly after the dispersion from the tower of Babel, describes Guatemalan fortifications, buildings, temples, and palaces, including the ruins of Palenque.
Loudon, Archibald, A Selection of Some of the Most Interesting Narratives of Outrages Committed by the Indians, in Their Wars with the White People, 2 vols. Carlisle, PA, 1811.

He supports the ten tribe theory, mentions that the Spaniards dug up Indian tombstones covered with Hebrew characters, and compares Peruvian temples to Jewish synagogues.
McCulloh, James H., Researches on America; Being an Attempt to Settle Some Points Relative to the Aborigines of America &c., Baltimore, 1817.

Discusses various theories explaining Indian origins, problems of transoceanic crossing, and discusses the theory that the mound builders were a white group more advanced than the Indians.
Mather, Cotton, India Christiana. A Discourse, Delivered unto the Commissioners, for the Propagation of the Gospel among the American Indians, Boston, 1721.

Suggests that those in the Old World could have sailed to America.
Mather, Samuel, An Attempt to Shew, that America Must Be Known to the Ancients, Boston, 1773.

He believes that America was populated by two major migrations, one from the tower of Babel and the other, centuries later, from Asia or possibly Phoenicia. He also subscribes to the theory that ancient America was visited by Christ's apostles or perhaps by some of the seventy.
Mills, Nicholas, History of Mexico, London, 1824.

Describes Mexican pyramids and compares them with those of Egypt.
Moulton, William, A Concise Extract, from the Sea Journal of William Moulton, Utica, NY, 1804.

He describes his visits to ruined Peruvian cities with "large palaces" and "elegant buildings" and Incan highways running over a thousand miles.
Niles, John Milton, A View of South America and Mexico, New York, 1825 (various ed. after that).

Describes palaces and temples in Peru.
Parrish, Elijah, A New System of Modern Geography, Newburyport, MA, 1810.

Parrish wrote his geography for use in New England schools. He describes mounds in North America and the Peruvian temple at Cusco. Includes a comparison of Indian and Israelite customs.
Poinsett, Joel Roberts, Notes on Mexico, Made in the Autumn of 1822, Philadelphia, 1824.

Mentions the Mexican tradition of the Flood, notes their immense pyramids and long paved roads, and mentions their hieroglyphic drawings and knowledge of astronomy and metallurgy.
Priest, Josiah, The Wonders of Nature and Providence, Displayed, Albany, 1825 and 1826.

A compilation of many previously published works, includes an extract from Francisco Clavigero's History of Mexico recounting the ancient Mexican traditions of idolatry and human sacrifice and a portion from Ethan Smith's View of the Hebrews detailing evidence that Indians were of Hebrew origin.
Rio, Antonio del, Description of the Ruins of an Ancient City, Discovered Near Palenque, in the Kingdom of Guatemala, London, 1822.

Rio describes various ruins at Palenque, includes plates of some of the structures, several Mayan codices. He suggests that the ancient Americans came by sea. He also mentions the tradition of an eclipse in AD 34 and speculates that the Mexican god Quetzalcoatl was St. Thomas preaching the gospel in ancient America.
Sewall, Samuel, Phaenomena Quaedam Apocalyptica, Boston, 1697 and 1727.

Suggests that the Indians are Israelites, that America might be the place of the New Jerusalem, and that the 'other sheep' mentioned in John 10:16 are the American Indians.
Smith, Ethan, View of the Hebrews; or the Tribes of Israel in America, Poultney, VT, 1823 and 1825.

Ethan Smith's is by far the most important and interesting work dealing with the origin of the American Indians and the mound builders. Suggests that the first settlers of the New World were the lost ten tribes of Israel. Includes extracts from von Humboldt's description of Mexican antiquities, Atwater's description of the mounds, and evidence from Adair and Boudinot to connect Indians with the lost ten tribes. He also mentions the Indian legend of the lost book of God, which would one day be returned.
Sullivan, James, The History of the District of Main, Boston, 1795.

He maintains the Ohio fortifications were built by people from Mexico and Peru because North American Indians did not possess the knowledge to construct them.
Thorowgood, Thomas, Jews in America, or , Probabilities That the Americans are of that Race, London, 1652.

He mentions the notion that the gospel was anciently preached in America. Emphasized the millennialistic nature of his Indian-Israelite identification and the importance of the Indians' conversion to Christianity.
Walton, William, Present State of the Spanish Colonies, 2 vols. London, 1810.

Mentions the Indian belief in the Creation and Flood and includes a description of Mexican architecture and metalwork.
Williams, Roger, A Key into the Language of America, Boston, 1827.

He believes that Indian language is a form of Hebrew and that their customs resemble those of the Jews. Although he is tolerant of the Indians, Williams believes their religion is devil inspired.
Williams, Samuel, The Natural and Civil History of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 1809.

Discusses various theories of Indian origins. Mentions the discovery of mammoth bones in North America.
Worsley, Israel, A View of the American Indians, London, 1828.

Relies heavily on Ethan Smith's View of the Hebrews. Believes mound builders had been destroyed by the Indians, mentions the discovery of large stone crosses in Central America and records the Indian tradition of a lost book of God.
Yates, John and Joseph Moulton, History of the State of New York, 1824.

They describe mounds and fortifications in their state and neighboring states, as well as the ruins of an ancient city near Palenque. According to them, these mounds, part of a great chain running down through Mexico and into South America, were built by a separate race of white-skinned people who were destroyed by the Indians. They mention the discovery of hieroglyphic writing and mammoth bones, and include reports that Indians in certain locales possessed the signs and tokens of Freemasonry.
_Meadowchik
_Emeritus
Posts: 1900
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:00 am

Re: The Book of Mormon is White Apologetics for the New Worl

Post by _Meadowchik »

One of my friends, a former visiting teacher, was raised in the belief of the Lamanite Generation. Her family's history and culture was merged into the Mormon Lamanite myth, the latter taking precedence. Discovering the paucity of reasons for that erasure was a major reason for her disaffection.
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: The Book of Mormon is White Apologetics for the New Worl

Post by _Maksutov »

The Book of Mormon is a racist alt-history novel written as Bible fan fiction. Mormonism will always be racist and Mormons will always be defending racism.
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_Meadowchik
_Emeritus
Posts: 1900
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:00 am

Re: The Book of Mormon is White Apologetics for the New Worl

Post by _Meadowchik »

Maksutov wrote:The Book of Mormon is a racist alt-history novel written as Bible fan fiction. Mormonism will always be racist and Mormons will always be defending racism.

Yes, and it would be better if people who used it did so with awareness of what it is.
_Shulem
_Emeritus
Posts: 12072
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:48 am

Re: The Book of Mormon is White Apologetics for the New Worl

Post by _Shulem »

Maksutov wrote:The Book of Mormon is a racist alt-history novel written as Bible fan fiction. Mormonism will always be racist and Mormons will always be defending racism.

Thus saith the King of Disco:

Mormons will ordain blacks next year!


Image
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: The Book of Mormon is White Apologetics for the New Worl

Post by _Gadianton »

Nowhere can the effect be seen more clearly than in the book Added Upon. And it's this message that fully inspires the Old-School Mopologists. An afterlife filled with travel to foreign galaxies 'conquered', so to speak, by a "master race of Gods" who should "never die". The apologists will yet be counted among these Gods, as they were the apex predators of their world, which was created by the Gods as a exercise in eugenics. In the eternities, the Mopologists mingle in a good-old-boy's fraternity of famous white males including George Washington, Martin Luther, and Socrates, who have been given honorary Godhood in order to bolster the reputations of the apologists.

And these are the kind of beliefs that are held by white male apologists to this very day in 2019! And the origin is no less than the imperialist foundation to their faith, the Book of Mormon. For those TBMs who expressed shock over the premise of Silence of the Lambs on the recent SeN thread, they should really think about the premise of the Book of Mormon sometime.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
Post Reply