DoubtingThomas wrote:So predictable. It is very easy to rationalize and defend anything.
Especially when you start with your conclusion and bend all conflicting evidence till it supports that preformed conclusion
DoubtingThomas wrote:So predictable. It is very easy to rationalize and defend anything.
Craig Paxton wrote:Arggg I broke one of my personal rules and started to read through the MD&D thread on this same subject and now I’m regretting that decision. I honestly want to punch one of those TBM posters in the face. OM Freaking god, Smith plagiarized and yet they are completely ok with it. They’re apologizing it all away much like the fraudulent Book of Abraham saying he used the biblical commentary like he did the papyrus as a catalyst for revelation. God damit, no he didn’t he ____ plagiarized. Why is everything so ____ squishy and pliable in Mormonism? God I absolutely hate that ____ board.
PS to add: Stem posted this link from a blog, very interesting. Smith unknowingly “cough cough” translated Mathew 26 of the JST twice...the differences between the two so called inspired translations is stark and telling. Just more evidence he made the whole thing up.
Link : https://thoughtsonthingsandstuff.com/tw ... scripture/
moksha wrote:Imagine what Joseph could have accomplished if he had Google at his disposal. He could have incorporated wisdom from the Vedas, the sutras of Buddha, the Poetic Edda, and the Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám.
Craig Paxton wrote:I honestly want to punch one of those TBM posters in the face. Why is everything so ____ squishy and pliable in Mormonism? God I absolutely hate that ____ board.